My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-07-19_REVISION - M1987026 (31)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1987026
>
2022-07-19_REVISION - M1987026 (31)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2025 6:28:09 AM
Creation date
7/19/2022 3:22:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987026
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/19/2022
Doc Name Note
BLM Environmental Assessment
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #3
From
Colorado Quarries Inc
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
ECS
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bureau of Land Management <br /> Royal Gorge Field Office Environmental Assessment <br /> DOI-BLM-CO-F020-2020-0036 EA <br /> Table 3.1. Issue Evaluations (Issues Analyzed or Not Analyzed in Detail) <br /> Brought Considered, <br /> Program area Issue statement(question) but further <br /> w/impact-causing element forward No Reason there is no issue or that Resource <br /> (in alphabetic order) for analysis specialist Date <br /> deemed issue further analysis is unnecessary <br /> analysis name <br /> unnecessary <br /> Presently the mine is classified(by <br /> CDPHE)as an APEN exempt source. <br /> The increase in mining is likely to <br /> trigger APEN and potentially <br /> permitting requirements for the mine. <br /> The major concern for air resources is <br /> the potential for fugitive dust <br /> emissions.Other emissions from <br /> equipment and site processes are very <br /> minor and will not contribute to any <br /> degradation of local air resources.The <br /> obsidian itself is not likely to <br /> Air Resources How will the proposed action contribute significantly to fugitive dust <br /> impact air quality? X based on its physical properties Chad Meister 10/4/2020 <br /> (relative to the area's overburden). <br /> Regardless,the operator will likely be <br /> required to implement best <br /> management practices for controlling <br /> fugitive dust in accordance with <br /> CDPHE requirements.As such,BLM <br /> anticipates only minor impacts from <br /> fugitive dust in the area of the mine <br /> itself,not the nearby towns or <br /> residences. The minor impacts are <br /> likely to occur regardless of BLMs <br /> decision since the majority of the <br /> expansion is scheduled to occur on <br /> 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.