Laserfiche WebLink
Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment <br /> Royal Gorge Field Office DOI-BLM-CO-F020-2020-0036 EA <br /> Brought Considered, <br /> Issue statement(question) but further Resource <br /> Program area forward No Reason there is no issue or that <br /> w/impact-causing element for analysis issue further analysis is unnecessaryspecialist Date <br /> (in alphabetic order) deemed name <br /> analysis <br /> unnecessary <br /> other lands.For all of these reasons, <br /> further analysis of air resource impacts <br /> is not necessary for the proposed <br /> action. <br /> In 1997 the BLM made a significant <br /> investment to locate the remaining <br /> public land in section 16. The <br /> proposed expansion will disturb <br /> numerous survey monuments that <br /> How would the new Black control the location of both land <br /> Obsidian Mineral Materials administered by the BLM and land in <br /> Contract affect the management private ownership. However,with the Rebecca <br /> Cadastral Survey of land boundaries and evidence X application of BLM Project Design Bruno 7/28/2020 <br /> of the Public Land Survey Features and BMPs,the impacts <br /> caused by future mining activities will <br /> System? be minimized or avoided.Therefore, <br /> the proposed action will not create a <br /> potential significant impact to <br /> management of land boundaries and <br /> evidence of the Public Land Survey <br /> System. <br /> Historic properties(sites eligible for <br /> Will the undertaking directly, the NRHP)were found in the area of <br /> indirectly,or cumulatively,and potential effect(see report the historic Monica However, CR-RG-20- <br /> Cultural Resources adversely,affect any historic X 067 P). 1/5/21 <br /> properties present in the area of properties will either not be adversely Weimer <br /> affected by the proposed undertaking <br /> potential effects? or will be avoided by project redesign <br /> (see Appendix D). <br /> 29 <br />