Laserfiche WebLink
South Hinsdale Response to Objections <br /> 12 July 2022 <br /> designation, this stretch along the river from Taylor Lane to the Countyline may not meet <br /> the standards. <br /> (2) Claim: only reason for operation is to make money — does not serve the great[er] <br /> good..." We appreciate that some persons are able to read minds, but the Texers have <br /> attempted to make clear that one of their major objectives in this project is to aid the <br /> community by providing needed material in an economical way and reducing <br /> environmental impacts of transport. They also need to make a living. See Section 5.11.10 <br /> Objections: <br /> (1) Objection: traffic — on surrounding roads See Section 5.3. We are unsure what <br /> "surrounding roads"are referred to here— Taylor Lane and Kleckner Lane would be used <br /> ONLY if material is to be delivered to addresses on those roads or connecting ONLY to <br /> those roads. Other USFS and County roads in both Hinsdale and Archuleta County other <br /> than FSR-631 (Piedra Road) would be used similarly. <br /> (2) Objection: air quality—traffic dust See Section 5.3 <br /> (3) Objection: noise—in the area See Section 5.7 <br /> (4) Objection: water quality— Piedra River See Section 5.2 <br /> (5)Objection: location—too close to river, dangerous to preservation of the river Sections <br /> 5.1 and 5.2 <br /> (6) Objection: social impacts — "to folks that neighbor the proposed site" — "risk of <br /> compromising the natural peace and beauty of the area" See Sections 5.7, 5.4.2, and 5.9 <br /> 3.27 York and Joanie Duncan <br /> 231 Taylor Lane <br /> List of one (1) claim and three (3)objections. <br /> Claims: <br /> (1) Claim: location -does not meet the planning guidelines See Section 5.1 <br /> Objections: <br /> (1) Objection: general — disruption — "dust clouds, dangerous traffic, air and water <br /> pollution, disturbance to wildlife, noise, etc." General comment addressed in various <br /> places of Section 5 for multiple objections <br /> (2) Objection: location—near Piedra Trailhead See Section 5.1 <br /> (3)Objection:viewshed—"unsitely[sic]mess in the middle of the valley" See Section 5.4.2 <br /> 3.28 Amy Smith <br /> List of three (3)objections. <br /> (1)Objection: traffic—"different kind of traffic" See Section 5.3. Traffic types (large trucks <br /> —including semis and trucks with trailers, pickups, and passenger vehicles) will be similar <br /> to traffic presently on Piedra Road for logging, ranching, tourists (RVs and pickups with <br /> campers), and commercial deliveries. <br /> (2) Objection: general—"noise, pollution and distraction" See Section 5. <br /> 5182-22-003 WAST£LIN£, INC. Page 49 of 107 <br />