Laserfiche WebLink
TR76 Proposed Bounday as shown on Map 1 <br /> car k' - •n ^i; ..:-� i .�.Y`� r . <br /> �. <br /> :� .. N <br /> t <br /> l r ' <br /> Legend <br /> PermitHo�rtdary_IJew Elk <br /> TR70 10.14ne2822 RBrise�d_wegt6vundgry <br /> world Imagery <br /> 9 1,000 2001,- 1;�00 FYYt <br /> I 1 I <br /> Figure 1 <br /> 2. Please revise the permit boundary on Map 1 so it is clearly distinguishable from the lease <br /> boundaries shown on the map. <br /> 3. Proposed revised Page 15 of Section 2.03,does not follow the currently approved text in the <br /> Permit Application Package (PAP). Please revise this page to follow the narrative and pagination <br /> currently approved in the PAP. <br /> Proposed Revised Section 2.04 <br /> 4. Proposed revised page 2.04-1 includes information and revisions associated with Permit Revision <br /> No. 5 (PR5)currently under review by DRMS. The PR5 revision has not been approved,please <br /> revise the currently approved PAP with information specific to TR76 and do not include any PR5 <br /> related information. <br /> 5. Similar to the item above,proposed revised page 2.04-8 includes a paragraph regarding PR5. The <br /> PR5 revision has not been approved,please remove this paragraph from the revised text. <br /> 6. Proposed revised page 2.04-8 indicates no new cultural resources were identified in the area of <br /> potential disturbance for the road. This statement is incorrect,based on the survey provided by <br /> NECC in Exhibit 7,two resources are identified along the road corridor(5LA.14443 and <br /> 5LA.14442) and the entire length of the former C&W railroad grade (5LA.7112)is reported to be <br />