Laserfiche WebLink
eligible for listing for the National Register of Historic Places(NRHP). Please specifically <br /> identify these resources on page 2.04-8 and provide a description of them. <br /> 7. Proposed revised page 2.04-42 does not appear to contain any revised information. Please <br /> explain? <br /> 8. Proposed revised page 2.04-47 does not appear to contain any revised information. Please <br /> explain? <br /> Proposed Revised Section 2.05.3 <br /> 9. Revised page 14 of section 2.05 states that roads constructed at the mine facility were established <br /> in the 1950's. This is not correct for the TR76 haul road or the RDA haul road. Please revise this <br /> page to distinguish which roads this statement pertain to. <br /> 10. Please provide an updated Map 11 — Sheet 1 and Map 11 — Sheet 4 showing the proposed Haul <br /> Road. <br /> 11. Please provide an updated Map 11 — Sheet 5,Map 11 — Sheet 6,and Map 15A showing the <br /> permit boundary. <br /> 12. Proposed Map 11 — Sheet 5 provides inconsistent numbering and placement of proposed culverts <br /> in comparison to the associated proposed Table 19a and Map 11 — Sheet 6. Please provide an <br /> updated Map 11 — Sheet 5 showing the correct culverts. <br /> Proposed Revised Section 2.05.5 <br /> 13. Proposed revised page 2.05-69 is missing a page number on the revised document. Please add <br /> this page number. <br /> Proposed Revised Section 2.05.6 <br /> Revised page 110 of section 2.05 states, "Research of the National Register of Historic Places indicates <br /> that there are no historic places near the New Elk Mine which will be affected by the mine's operation." <br /> This is incorrect based on information provided in Exhibit 7 for TR76 by NECC. Please address the <br /> following: <br /> 14. Three Cultural and Historic Resources are located within the affected area associated with TR76 <br /> according to Arcadis study proposed to be included in Exhibit 7. According to the report for <br /> resources 5LA.14442 and 5LA.14443,no work will be conducted on these features and they are <br /> not recommended nor individually eligible for listing in the NRHP. However,the report was <br /> originally drafted for the reconstruction of the railroad,not the construction of the haul road. <br /> Please confirm that no additional work will be or was done for these features associated with the <br /> construction of the haul road and update the Section 2.05.6(4)of the PAP to indicate this. <br /> 15. The haul road proposed with TR76 has already been constructed and was associated with <br /> violation CV-2021-001 issued by DRMS. Therefore impacts to the former C&W railroad grade <br /> (5LA.7112)has already occurred. The Division is consulting with the State Historic Preservation <br /> Officer(SHPO)on how to address this. In accordance with Rule 2.05.6(4)(b),NECC may be <br /> required to conduct appropriate mitigation and treatment of this feature. The Division will <br /> provide the results of this consultation with SHPO as soon as they are available. For the time <br /> being,please update section 2.05.6(4)explaining this resources was affected by the construction <br /> of the haul road prior to DRMS approval. <br />