Laserfiche WebLink
To: Mr. f'etcr flays <br /> Date: FcbMar�, 21, 2022 <br /> Page 15 <br /> Slide-2D. We can provide the modeling files to DRMS upon request. The analysis utilized <br /> the characterization from over 35 boreholes that show the materials are at sandy gravels <br /> and gravely sands. Telesto used the minimum shear strength (with no cohesion) from <br /> literature values for those materials. Thus, the analysis meets the "worst-case scenario" <br /> request indicated in Comment 34 (although the regulations do not require worst-case <br /> scenarios). <br /> Comment 35 <br /> The Geotechnical Stability cover letter states the analysis shows that LRM can excavate <br /> the pits wet using a large excavator, but that the excavator will require a working platform <br /> roughly 16'x20'to distribute the load. The platform requirement is not discussed in Exhibit <br /> D — Mining Plan. Please revise Exhibit D to incorporate the requirements of the <br /> geotechnical stability report. <br /> Response 35 <br /> Attachment 13 updates Exhibit D. Updates in Sections 6.1.2 and 6.2 specify that LRM <br /> mine at slopes and with appurtenances indicated by the slope stability analyses presented <br /> in Appendix B 1 (Attachment 12). <br /> Comment 36 <br /> The Applicant selected a required factor of safety (FOS) of 1.3 from Table I — <br /> Recommended Minimum Factors of Safety for Slope Stability Analyses for Operations and <br /> Reclamation. The selected FOS is for strength measurements resulting from multiple tests. <br /> The Division does not agree the Applicant's utilization of the results of particle-size <br /> distributions and boring logs qualifies as tests. The Division will require the Applicant to <br /> meet a factor of safety of 1.5, unless laboratory strength tests were performed on soils at <br /> the site. <br /> Response 36 <br /> It is our experience that laboratory testing will produce strength parameter results weaker <br /> than the lowest literature values for the identified materials, and that identifying the types <br /> of materials present is extremely important. Regardless,we have re-calculated the stability <br /> analysis utilizing a FOS of 1.5. As infrastructure is designed for construction(e.g.,bridge <br /> abutments, access roads)and mining commences, LRM will collect samples for laboratory <br /> strength tests. They will update the slope stability analysis based on those results and <br /> submit a technical revision at that time to use a FOS of 1.3 and update safe mining slopes. <br /> Comment 37 <br /> In the Conclusions section of the stability report, the Applicant states it is safe for DRMS's <br /> reclamation slope of 2H.•1 V, and can be steepened to 1.78H.•I V during mining as long as <br /> 20220209_1045_DRMS_Adequacy_Revietiv_Response_MASTE <br /> Rdocx TELEST® <br />