My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022-02-23_PERMIT FILE - M2021059 (13)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2021059
>
2022-02-23_PERMIT FILE - M2021059 (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2025 5:12:23 AM
Creation date
2/23/2022 9:33:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2021059
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/23/2022
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Telesto
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
PSH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
324
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To- Nir. Peter Ha`s <br /> Date: February 21. 2022 <br /> Pa,,e 14 <br /> Comment 31 <br /> The Applicant submitted a copy of the structure agreement cover letter for Janice Knaub. <br /> Ms. Knaub is not listed as a permanent man-made structure owner in Exhibit S or on <br /> Exhibit C-17. Please explain this discrepancy and revise the Exhibits as required. <br /> Response 31 <br /> Ms. Knaub's property is partially within the 200-foot offset of the Project's boundary, <br /> while her structures are over 200 feet from the Project boundary. <br /> Comment 32 <br /> The Inlet Protection report submitted for the Dunn Pit application was reviewed by Rob <br /> Zuber with the Division. A copy of Mr. Zuber's review memo dated December 17, 2021 is <br /> attached. Please respond to the adequacy questions contained in the memo. <br /> Response 32 <br /> We respond to the comments on the inlet protection report subsequently. <br /> Comment 33 <br /> Exhibits F, G and Appendix D for the Dunn Pit application were reviewed by Patrick <br /> Lennberg with the Division. A copy of Mr. Lennberg's review memo dated December 9, <br /> 2021 is attached. Please respond to the adequacy questions contained in the memo. <br /> Response 33 <br /> We respond to the comments by Mr. Lennberg subsequently. <br /> 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Exhibit <br /> Comment 34 <br /> The Applicant submitted a Factor of Safety calculation based on assumed soil properties <br /> to demonstrate the geotechnical stability of the mined and reclaimed slopes. The Division <br /> will require the Applicant to provide an engineering stability analysis for the proposed <br /> mined and reclaimed slopes. The model must be performed using stability analysis software <br /> to allow verification of the models by the Division. The stability analysis model must <br /> assume the worstcase scenario for the mined and reclaimed slopes. <br /> Response 34 <br /> As documented in the calculation set provided in Appendix B of the 112c Permit <br /> Application update(October 2021)and the updated Appendix B 1 (Attachment 12),Telesto <br /> completed a slope stability analysis of the planned mined and reclaimed slopes utilizing <br /> 20220209_1045_DRA S_Adequacy Review Response_MASTE <br /> R.docx TELESTO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.