Laserfiche WebLink
ACZ Laboratories, Inc. <br />2773 Downhill Drive Stearrnhoat Springs CO 80487 (800) 334-5493 <br />Ouray Silver Mines <br />M365 1 - Auto Ascorbic Acid <br />(digest) <br />WG530712 Potassium (1312) M6010D ICP <br />WG530627 Residue, Filterable (TDS) a_180C (1312) SM2540C <br />SM2540C <br />WG531061 Residue, Non -Filter (TSS) _'80C (1312- SM2540D <br />DI) <br />SM2540D <br />WG530915 <br />Selenium (1312) <br />Silver(1312) <br />WG530712 <br />Sodium ,1312) <br />WG532073 <br />Sulfate (1312-DI) <br />WG530915 <br />Thallium (1312) <br />WG530712 <br />T n (1312) <br />WG530612 <br />Total A,kal nity <br />WG5309'5 <br />Uranium t1312l <br />Vanadium (1312) <br />Zinc (1312) <br />REPAID 15 06 05 01 <br />SM2540D <br />M6020B ICP-MS <br />M6020B ICP-MS <br />M6010D ICP <br />M300 0 - Ion Chromatography <br />M6020B ICP-MS <br />M6010D ICP <br />SM2320B - Titration <br />M6020B ICP-MS <br />M6020B ICP-MS <br />M6020B ICP-MS <br />ACZ Project ID L69169 <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br />sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL) <br />ZG The ICP or ICP-MS Serial Dilution was not used for data <br />val dat on because the sample concentration was less than <br />53'imes Ine MDL <br />N1 See Case Narrative <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />val dat on because the concentration of the duplicated <br />sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL) <br />DJ Sample dilution required due to insufficient sample <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br />sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 10x MDL) <br />Z3 Sampie volume yielded a residue less than 2 5 mg <br />RA Reahve Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation oecause the concentration of the duplicated <br />sample ,s too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL) <br />RA Reiabve Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br />sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br />sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL) <br />HD Analysis is outside the intended scope of the method, which <br />does not orovide hold time information for soil extracts No <br />hold time is observed for collection to extraction The <br />referenced method hold time is observed for extraction -to - <br />analysis <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />val,dat'on because the concentration of the duplicated <br />sample s too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br />sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL) <br />Q6 Sample was received above recommended temperature <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br />sari is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />vandat on because the concentration of the duplicated <br />sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL) <br />RA Relative Percent Difference (RPD) was not used for data <br />val'dat'on because the concentration of the duplicated <br />sample is too low for accurate evaluation (< 1 Ox MDL) <br />L69169-21 1 1231041 Page 21 of 28 <br />