Laserfiche WebLink
November 4,2021 C-1981-035/King Coal Mine JHB <br /> The West pond was partially cleaned of sediment until the pond became too wet to complete the clean out. GCC <br /> is allowing the sediment to dry some more, and anticipates they may be able to continue the sediment clean out. <br /> As such,the berm has not been completely re-established to allow equipment access for sediment clean out. The <br /> West pond does have sediment storage capacity,but GCC hopes to clean it further. <br /> Collection ditches at King I were in good repair and functional. The SAE's on the West and East sides of the haul <br /> road into King I were in adequate condition. The West side SAE would benefit from clean out of the sediment <br /> prior to the winter months. <br /> Old Barn Area: The silt fence at the old barn area is holding up well. A small pool of water is held upslope of the <br /> hay bales in the drainage point of the silt fencing near the barn. The silt fencing remains properly keyed in with no <br /> bypassing of the sediment control structures onto the county road. Drainage of the access road is directed <br /> appropriately. Wade reported that the contractor grades the roadway regularly. Water bars get graded out,but the <br /> road is compacted well enough that no gullies are forming. Cuts in the roadside berms need to be maintained as <br /> some of them are blocked from the road grading. By keeping the drainage cuts functional,this will reduce the <br /> volume of flow at the base of the roadway. Sediment and runoff management at the Old Barn area appears to be <br /> adequately controlled. <br /> King II: The sediment Pond at King II was damp but not holding a pool of water. The embankments are well <br /> vegetated and not weedy. Wade mentioned that GCC hopes to clean sediment out of this pond as conditions <br /> allow. Sediment storage capacity is still adequate for Pond 1,but clean out is part of the operator's regular <br /> maintenance of the pond. <br /> The haul road SAE/Gravel storage area Silt fence is holding up well and appropriately keyed in. The cattle guard <br /> SAE was cleaned out and appeared to contain adequate storage capacity prior to the winter months. <br /> Ditches throughout the King II facilities area were clear of debris and in good condition. Culverts at the <br /> warehouse/maintenance area CI &CI were clear and flowing unimpeded. <br /> PROCESSING WASTE/COAL MINE WASTE PILES—Rule 4.10 and 4.11 <br /> Drainage Control; Surface Stabilization;Placement: <br /> The operator was not hauling refuse to the RDA at the time of the inspection. GCC had been placing <br /> material on the lower refuse area earlier this fall. The lower RDA is sloped to the west. This appears to <br /> concentrate the runoff to the curve just south of where the haul road adjoins the lower RDA. This has resulted in <br /> gullying on the side of the RDA to Reach 10 ditch(west of the bathhouse). All refuse material that came off the <br /> lower RDA bench was contained in the ditch. Cleaning material out of the ditch and building up the outside of the <br /> ditch will assure that runoff is able to be contained in the ditch and flow towards the West Pond. <br /> GCC needs to place and grade the refuse material on the lower RDA to the design specifications in Appendix <br /> 10(4A). This will minimize the runoff velocity off the top of the pile. Page 16 of Appendix 10(4A)describes the <br /> management of the surface grading. The RDA needs to keep the lower RDA bench in compliance with with this <br /> design. <br /> The haul road to the upper RDA was in good condition. GCC has not been hauling material to the upper RDA this <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 2 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />