My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2021-05-12_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2021-05-12_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2025 6:12:06 AM
Creation date
5/17/2021 6:11:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/12/2021
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Ouray Silver Mines, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR12
Email Name
LJW
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AraZ Laboratories, Inc. MEE <br /> 2773 Downhill Drive Steamboat Springs, CO 80487 (800)334-5493 • s <br /> ACZ Project ID: L65443 <br /> METHOD <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1Ox MDL). <br /> 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1Ox MDL). <br /> 1,2,3-Trichloropropane M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane M8260C/D GUMS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> 1,2-Dibromoethane M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,2-Dichlorobenzene M8260C/D GUMS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,2-Dichloroethane M826OC/D GC/MS M1 Matrix spike recovery was high,the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> M8260C/D GUMS VC CCV recovery was above the acceptance limits.Target <br /> analyte was not detected in the sample[<MDL]. <br /> 1,2-Dichloropropane M8260C/D GUMS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,3,5-Tri methyl benzene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,3-Dichlorobenzene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> 1,3-Dichloropropane M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> 1,4-Dichlorobenzene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> 2,2-Dichloropropane M8260C/D GC/MS M1 Matrix spike recovery was high,the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> 2-Butanone M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> M8260C/D GC/MS VB CCV recovery was outside of acceptance limits.See Case <br /> Narrative. <br /> 2-Chlorotoluene M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<1 Ox MDL). <br /> 2-Hexanone M8260C/D GC/MS M1 Matrix spike recovery was high,the recovery of the <br /> associated control sample(LCS or LFB)was acceptable. <br /> M8260C/D GC/MS RA Relative Percent Difference(RPD)was not used for data <br /> validation because the concentration of the duplicated <br /> sample is too low for accurate evaluation(<10x MDL). <br /> M8260C/D GUMS VC CCV recovery was above the acceptance limits.Target <br /> REPAD.15.06.05.01 <br /> L65443-2105101543 Page 26 of 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.