My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-12-14_REVISION - M1977321
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977321
>
2020-12-14_REVISION - M1977321
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2025 6:08:58 AM
Creation date
12/15/2020 6:19:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977321
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/14/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Environment, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
JPL
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environment, Inc. Page 3 <br /> Summit Brick and Tile Company Native/Pierre Mine <br /> Adequacy Response 01 December 10, 2020 <br /> The maximum affected area is the same as the permit area 35.23 acres and <br /> maximum disturbed area is 31.25 acres. For bonding purposes, Summit committed to <br /> having no more then 10 acres needing reclamation. The C-1 - Mining Plan Map shows <br /> the processing and mining area as disturbed and area along the east side that while <br /> disturbed has been reclaimed but not released at that time. <br /> EXHIBIT E—Reclamation Plan (Rule 6.4.5): <br /> 10. Please provide a signed affidavit certifying that the discarded brick factory materials and <br /> processing waste materials, that will be used as backfill material, are clean and inert pursuant to <br /> Rule 3.1.5(9)(c). <br /> Attached is an inert fill affidavit required by Rule 3.1.5(9)(c). It is inert material <br /> consisting of broken concrete and asphalt, reject or broke brick and natural materials <br /> screened from the raw material delivered to the brick plant. <br /> 11. The post-mining land use is stated to be Residential but on question#13 of the application the post <br /> mining land use is marked Industrial/Commercial, please clarify. <br /> The property is zoned Residential-2 but is operated under a Non-Conforming use as <br /> an I-2 use area. I have attached a copy of the information provided by the City of <br /> Pueblo in 1977. Question 13 is Primary present land use The industrial commercial was <br /> chosen as it most closely matches the current use and as noted the City said in 1977, <br /> the current use was I-2 . The final end use did not change. <br /> 12. Does the operator intend to use fertilizer or mulching as part of the reclamation? <br /> The existing and proposed Reclamation Plans say no mulching or fertilization is <br /> planned. I found a contradiction in the Reclamation Cost Estimate for the <br /> Revegetation activity. I have corrected the Exhibit L - Reclamation Cost Estimate <br /> to remove any reference to mulching and fertilizer application. <br /> 13. The Division requests a copy of the weed control program for the site or include a section that <br /> describes the methods of weed control that will be employed for all prohibited noxious weed <br /> species, pursuant to Rule 3.1.10(8). <br /> I added a section in the Reclamation Plan called Weed Control and have attached a <br /> copy of the Weed Control Plan for the record. <br /> 14. Please provide the missing seed mix provided by the NRCS that was supposed to the follow the <br /> Reclamation Timetable. <br /> This statement appears to have been wrong, we presumed it was included in the <br /> original Vegetation information. I have included a seed mix table to the Exhibit E - <br /> Reclamation Plan showing the proposed seed mix with Pounds-PL5 for each species in <br /> the mix. I used White prairieclover as the Lignum since non was spelled out in the <br /> original recommendation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.