My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-10-27_PERMIT FILE - C1981035 (20)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2020-10-27_PERMIT FILE - C1981035 (20)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2025 5:13:41 AM
Creation date
12/1/2020 12:23:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
10/27/2020
Doc Name
Page 251-303
Section_Exhibit Name
KII Appendix 18 Lease Modification Final EA (Page 251-303)
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Biological Assessment <br /> Federal Coal Lease Modification(COC-62920)and Federal Mine Permit(CO-0106A)Revision and Renewal <br /> Unlike the Pueblo facility, the Tij eras kiln is fired entirely on coal (a minor amount of natural gas <br /> is used for startup). Similarly, the permit does not contain explicit limits for greenhouse gas and <br /> mercury emissions, but does provide for mercury-monitoring requirements and performance- <br /> based standards. <br /> Table 6-2. Tijeras Facility King II emissions (maximum tons per year) <br /> PMto PM2.5 CO NOx VOC SO2 CO2eg <br /> (pounds per year) <br /> 135 66 790 772 79 21 167,662 25 <br /> Source: BLM/OSMRE 2017. <br /> Key: CO=carbon monoxide,CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent,Hg=mercury,NOX nitrous oxides,PMio=particulates less than 10 <br /> microns in diameter,PM2.5=particulates less than 2.5 microns in diameter,S02=sulfur dioxide,VOC=volatile organic compound. <br /> Mercury emissions from the DSNGRR are expected to be less than 0.25 pound per year <br /> respectively and have no significant impacts. <br /> These indirect sources would incrementally contribute greenhouse gas emissions to the <br /> biosphere, which could contribute to climate change. With respect to the indirect source's <br /> impacts on climate change, neither the BLM nor OSMRE possesses appropriate tools or <br /> analytical methods to assess how these emissions could potentially affect the climate at local, <br /> regional, or global scales. Given the nature of the climate change issue (i.e., it is a cumulative <br /> problem) the impacts (described in Section 6.1.3, Cumulative Impacts)would be expected to be <br /> the same with or without the Proposed Actions effects on indirect sources <br /> 6.1.3 Cumulative Impacts <br /> The environmental baseline includes the past and present impacts of all state and private actions <br /> in the AA, as well as the anticipated impacts of all proposed federal projects in the AA that have <br /> already undergone formal or early Section 7 consultation. <br /> Past, ongoing, and foreseeable activities in the cumulative impacts analysis area that have <br /> affected these species, or would in the future, include any activity that would affect the aquatic <br /> environment for the subject fish species. Reasonably foreseeable developments in the AA <br /> include the following: <br /> ■ Residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal development <br /> ■ Road and utility construction <br /> ■ Oil and gas extraction <br /> ■ Hard-rock mining <br /> ■ Coal, sand, and gravel mining <br /> July 2017 <br /> 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.