Laserfiche WebLink
Biological Assessment <br /> Federal Coal Lease Modification(COC-62920)and Federal Mine Permit(CO-0106A)Revision and Renewal <br /> The combustion-related indirect effects from stationary sources are either unknown or are <br /> currently regulated by agencies with authority to set limits and conditions to provide for <br /> compliance with the applicable Clean Air Act regulations. The air quality analysis in the EA is <br /> limited to disclosing emissions and the permits where all the compliance obligations for the <br /> known sources are contained—the GCC Pueblo, Colorado and Tij eras, New Mexico cement <br /> plants. The Proposed Action is not expected to change daily operations or the compliance <br /> obligations of these facilities. The Proposed Action would essentially represent a continuation of <br /> currently authorized activities. According to the monitoring data for the known downstream <br /> facilities (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2017), air quality has been meeting—and could <br /> be expected to continue to meet—the NAAQS. <br /> Even though La Plata, Bernalillo, and Pueblo counties would not exceed the NAAQS under the <br /> Proposed Action, the concentration, mobility, and toxicity of trace metals in biological systems <br /> are of general scientific and public interest. The cement plants in Tij eras, New Mexico and <br /> Pueblo, Colorado are expected to contribute mercury emissions from coal combustion. Mercury <br /> is dispersed by wind erosion and by percolating waters and instream flow(Roberts and <br /> Johnson 1978). Inorganic mercury is deposited on the landscape, transported from soils to <br /> wetlands and surface waters, and converted by bacteria to methylmercury—the organic form of <br /> mercury that is readily absorbed by fish and other organisms. <br /> The GCC Rio Grande Pueblo plant(Table 6-1) has a permit(#98PB0893) condition that limits <br /> annual firing fuel (coal and tire-derived fuel)to no more than 198,418 tons on a rolling 12-month <br /> basis. King 11 currently supplies 105,000 tons of coal annually (approximately 53 percent by <br /> weight)to the facility, and expects this to remain constant going forward. The plant also burns <br /> natural gas when market conditions are favorable. The permit lists total site-wide emissions <br /> limits for the facility that cover numerous emissions sources and activities including the kiln, <br /> quarry operations, material transfer and storage, and other facilities equipment. <br /> Table 6-1.Pueblo Facility King II emissions (maximum tons per year) <br /> PM10 PM2.5 CO NOx VOC S02 CO2e Hg <br /> (pounds per year) <br /> 221 217 588 604 52 505 597,148 10-15 <br /> Source:BLM/OSMRE 2017. <br /> Key: CO=carbon monoxide,CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent,Hg=mercury,NOX nitrous oxides,PMio=particulates less than 10 <br /> microns in diameter,PM2.5=particulates less than 2.5 microns in diameter,S02=sulfur dioxide,VOC=volatile organic compound. <br /> The GCC Rio Grande Tij eras plant(Table 6-2) has similar operations to that of the Pueblo <br /> facility and is covered under New Mexico Title V permit#532. The air permit and underlying <br /> construction permits provide for all the same source requirements (controls and monitoring) as <br /> the Pueblo facility and are available from the Albuquerque Environmental Health Department for <br /> public review. <br /> July 2017 <br /> 28 <br />