Laserfiche WebLink
Miranda Kawcak <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />2020 October 29 <br />All Rules referenced within this document are contained within the Regulations. <br />Rule: 2.10 Maps and Plans <br />October 2020 DBMS: DRMS finds that Moffat County Mining LLC, addressed this rule <br />adequately with the exception of: <br />Rule: 2.05.3 Operational Plan <br />October 2020 DRMS: DRMS finds the submitted revised pages address this rule adequately with <br />the exception of the following: <br />1. Please see discussion on revised pages below. <br />Rule: 2.05.4 Reclamation Plan <br />This is a review of the reclamation plan to achieve post mining land use. Map 29, Reclamation <br />Plan Map submitted with this application was reviewed as were associated revised pages. <br />October 2020 DRMS: DRMS finds the submitted revised pages and map address this rule <br />adequately with the exception of the following: <br />2. Please see discussion on revised pages below <br />Rule: 3.02.2 Determination of Bond <br />2020 October DRMS: DRMS utilized the acreages provided in Table 72 of the TR38 submission for <br />calculating revegetation costs associated with cropland and pastureland land uses. DRMS finds that <br />Moffat County Mining did not submit a reclamation cost estimate as per (Rule 2.05.4(2)(b), and has <br />the following questions with respect to the reclamation cost estimate performed by DRMS: <br />3. Please verify that Moffat County Mining agrees with DRMS's methodology for calculating <br />revegetation costs associated with crop and pastureland land use designations specific to <br />revegetation tasks 63 and 64 in the Cost Estimate provided under separate cover. <br />There is a reference to the Amoco Pond and the Amoco Pipeline Road. DRMS is unsure where these <br />facilities are/were located. The reclamation of this pond constitutes task 79 and the road task 77. <br />4. Please clarify where these facilities are located with respect to the submitted Map 29. <br />5. Also, please verify if tasks 77 and 79 should be included in the cost estimate for TR38. <br />Currently they are included in the cost estimate provided under separate cover and associated <br />with this adequacy review. <br />TR38: Preliminary Adequacy <br />