My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-09-08_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2020-09-08_REVISION - M2012032 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2024 4:11:03 AM
Creation date
9/8/2020 9:31:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/8/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Ouray Silver Mines
To
DRMS
Email Name
LJW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
l <br /> LUFMY SILI ER 9htiE5 <br /> trailer(s) and sold or disposed of off-site. Remaining amounts of the inert materials of the <br /> structure will be dismantled and used as backfill for the mine portals. <br /> 3. DRMS Comment:Section 3 Reclamation Plan Update <br /> Section 3 references a modified reclamation plan map labeled as Map F-I however Map F-1 <br /> was not submitted. Please submit the revised Map F-1 and take into account all applicable items <br /> in this review that should be reflected on the revised map. Please also note that the features on <br /> the updated Reclamation Plan Map F-1 should include but is not limited to structures to remain <br /> post-reclamation, surface features such as ponds to remain post-reclamation and the final <br /> topography of all reclaimed areas. If necessary, several maps may be used to convey the <br /> required information. <br /> OSMI Response: Map F-1 was included with the original TR-I I application submittal however, <br /> during the course of developing responses to DRMS's comments, OSMI realized there were <br /> errors in Map F-1 including an incorrect permit boundary as well as depiction of Diversion Ditch <br /> #1,which has not been constructed and there are currently no plans to construct such a channel. <br /> A copy of the corrected Map F-1 is provided in Attachment 2 OSMI reviewed other past <br /> submittals to DRMS and discovered there were several drawings submitted with the same error. <br /> OSMI will be submitting corrected drawings under a separate cover letter. <br /> 4. DRMS Comment:Section 3.3 Topsoil Placement and RevePetation <br /> The narrative of this section proposes a revised topsoil replacement depth of 6 inches in areas to <br /> receive topsoil and ultimately be revegetated, and all other areas to be capped with waste rock. <br /> In the revised map listed in Item 3 of this review,please depict all areas to receive topsoil and <br /> the areas to be capped with waste rock. The narrative also states that the previous area to <br /> receive topsoil is 9.3 Acres however records indicate the previously proposed areas to be top <br /> soiled at 12.43 Acres. And Table E-3 indicates that the total area in Acres to receive imported <br /> topsoil is 4.74 Acres. Please clarify in a narrative and associated map the total number of acres <br /> of the areas to be capped with waste rock and areas to receive topsoil and revegetation. Please <br /> also indicate, the quantity of topsoil that already exists on site, and how much will be imported <br /> to guarantee the total amount of topsoil required for reclamation is stored on site. <br /> OSMI Response: There are approximately 5.43 acres that require topsoil per the updated <br /> Reclamation Plan and per the TR-I I narrative. This 5.43 acres is comprised of 4.74 acres for the <br /> Atlas and the Revenue-Virginius Tailings Storage Facilities and non-waste areas plus <br /> approximately 0.69 acres for reclamation of the three shaft areas. Materials for the shaft <br /> reclamation will come from the berms that will be constructed when the shafts are developed. <br /> The remaining 4.74 acres will require imported topsoil,which equates to approximately 4,001 <br /> cubic yards of soil that Ouray Silver will need to import for reclamation of the Atlas and <br /> Revenue-Virginius Tailings Storage Facilities. <br /> DRMS is correct that early permit documents identify 12.43 acres requiring topsoil. However, as <br /> part of Technical Revision 4, the disturbance footprint of the Atlas TSF was reduced by <br /> 3 1 P a g e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.