Laserfiche WebLink
NEWMONT <br /> references Drawing C-'. Drawing C-2 does not show the pregnant.solution pipeline alignment nor the <br /> extent of liner,for phases?and 3 of b"LF?. If the pipeline is not over the liner in«nv location, secondary <br /> containment is required similar to that installed south of the High Grade dill between 6 LFI and 6"LF2. <br /> Please provide a figure showing the proposed pregnant solution and barren solution pipe alignments <br /> relative to the approved and proposed VLF liner system. <br /> Newmont Response: <br /> Drawing C-2 shows existing utilities, and the pipeline has not yet been constructed, Drawing C-3 <br /> (Attachment 6) has been updated to show the proposed pipeline alignment. Additional details <br /> showing the proposed pipeline relative the VLF liner system is shown in the updated design <br /> (Attachment 13). <br /> DBMS Comment(italics): <br /> 31. Section -.4 Security anti Sim. Please update this section to reflect the new requirements of Rule <br /> 3.1.12 regarding the mime site entrance signs. Specifically, the name of the operation needs to be <br /> included on the sign. .4dditionally, the minimum size of the sign with appropriate font. <br /> Newmont Response: <br /> Section 7.4 has been updated to reflect requirements of Rule 3.1.12. Updated Exhibit D is included in <br /> Attachment 8. <br /> DRMS Comment(italics): <br /> 32. Section -.4 Security and Sim. The narrative discussing the fencing of higInt•alls greater than 100 <br /> feet in depth which remain upon completion of mining and reclamation is inconsistent with that <br /> which was approved through previous adequacy review processes. In accordance with a prior <br /> commitment, please revise this to state that upon completion of mining and reclamation, a 6-foot <br /> high (minimum) chain link fence will he installed around the crest of all highwalls which are not <br /> reduced or backf filled. Please also revise this under Section 1.5.1 of the Exhibit E Reclamation Plan. <br /> Please note, through the reviews of.4AI- 11 anti TR-91, it was determined the minimum height of <br /> the fence should be 8-1eet high to be protective of large ungulates. <br /> Newmont Response: <br /> CC&V has committed to installing an 8-foot wire Post Mining Fence at closure, as approved in TR-91. <br /> Section 1.5.1 of the Reclamation Plan has been revised to state: "Upon completion of mining and <br /> associated reclamation activities, an eight-foot high Post Mining Fence eight-foot high fence will be <br /> installed around the external crest of those portions of the remaining highwalls that are greater than <br /> approximately 100 feet vertically below the crest and steeper than 2.514:1 V'". A copy of the revised <br /> Reclamation Plan is provided in Attachment 10. <br />