Laserfiche WebLink
Tom Bird C1981035 TR29 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />April 8, 2020 <br />GCC has renumbered section 2.04.6p. 8, to 2.04.6p. 7A, and submitted the revised <br />page. This response is adequate. <br />4) On page 3A in Section 2.05.3, please provide more detail to describe where the new spoil <br />material will be stored. Please show the location on a map. <br />GCC Energy, provided additional detail to show the access road between the three <br />portals has been modified for greater safety and utility. The revised cut/fill balance <br />numbers (see map King II -007M) no longer indicate a surplus of spoil material. <br />Topsoil salvaged during construction will be placed on the existing topsoil pile which <br />lies to the north of coal stacker #2. Map King II -007M was updated by GCC <br />5/8/2010 revised page submittal. This response is adequate. <br />5) Page 3A in Section 2.05.3, please state if the pond size did or did not change with the <br />increased disturbed area. <br />GCC Energy added a statement to revised Section 2.05.5 page 3B verifying that the <br />pond size did not change with the increased disturbed area. This explanation is <br />acceptable. <br />6) On Page 5 in Section 2.05.3, text regarding sampling runoff from SAES has been removed. <br />Please explain. Also on this page, please explain if the two 24" culverts are C22. <br />GCC Energy provided a response on 5/8/2020, that the two 24 " culverts referred to on <br />Section 2.05.3 page 5 are labelled C22 on map King II -007A. As suggested, text has also <br />been added to Section 2.05.3 page 5. <br />However, the Division has the remaining concern; in the response to our PAR (dated 8 May <br />2020), GCC Energy did not address the following. On Page 5 in Section 2.05.3, the currently <br />approved PAP contains the following text: "GCC Energy, LLC commits to sampling any <br />discharge from this area for Total Settleable Solids whenever practical (when GCC Energy <br />personnel are on-site during runoff event)." Please explain why this text was removed <br />7) In the Drainage Basin ID Table, please explain why the facility areas are described as forest. <br />Are curve numbers of 80 appropriate? <br />GCC Energy's 0510812020 response: GCC determined that instead of submitting new <br />Appendix 11 (2) for the TR -29 affected drainages, a new SECDAD analysis and the various <br />