My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-05-28_REVISION - C1981035
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
2020-05-28_REVISION - C1981035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2020 6:47:00 AM
Creation date
5/29/2020 6:43:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/28/2020
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response #2
From
DRMS
To
GCC Energy, LLC
Type & Sequence
TR29
Email Name
JHB
THM
RDZ
ZTT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COLORADO <br />_/ Division of Reclamation, <br />® Mining and Safety <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />Tom Bird <br />Manager of Coal Services <br />GCC Energy, LLC <br />6473 County Road 120 <br />Hesperus, CO 81326 <br />tbirdkgcc. com <br />May 27, 2020 <br />Re: King I and II Mine, C1981-035, Technical Revision No. 29 <br />Preliminary Adequacy Response Review and Adequacy No. 2 <br />Dear Mr. Bird: <br />The Division has reviewed GCC's responses the Division's preliminary adequacy review, dated <br />April 8, 2020. GCC's responses were received by the Division on May 8, 2020. Addition revised <br />pages were submitted on May 13, 2010. The Division's original concerns are included in plain <br />font, with the Division's review of GCC's responses following in italics. Please find the Division's <br />remaining adequacy concerns: <br />1) In King I Mine Section 2.03.8, why did the affected area for TR -22 drill holes decrease? The <br />same question is applicable for this page in King II Section 2.03.8. <br />The Division finds GCC's explanation in the May 8, 2013 Adequacy response letter <br />acceptable. <br />2) In King I Mine Section 2.03.8, it appears that the change in disturbed area may be incorrect. <br />It was increased 2.15 acres, but the stated increase on page 3A in Section 2.05.3 is 2.51 acres. <br />On Page 6 in Section 2.05.3 (last paragraph), please check the value of 2.15 acres. In one or <br />the other places the numbers may have been transposed. Please clarify that the proposed <br />disturbed acreage remain consistent. <br />The Division finds GCC's response from the May 8, adequacy response letter <br />adequate; 2.15 acres is the correct proposed increased acres. No further response is <br />required for this item. <br />3) Regarding King 11 Mine Section 2.04.6 page 8, is the page number correct? Does GCC <br />Energy intend to delete the section Refuse Pile Chemistry in the existing PAP, which is <br />currently on page 8? <br />.OF 'Co <br />y ' <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215, Denver, CO 80203 P 303.866.3567 F 303.832.8106 http://mining.state.co.us I <br />Jared S. Polis, Governor I Dan Gibbs, Executive Director I Virginia Brannon, Director *�* <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.