My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-10-01_REVISION - M2012050 (13)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2012050
>
2019-10-01_REVISION - M2012050 (13)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2025 4:28:59 AM
Creation date
10/2/2019 12:17:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012050
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/1/2019
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
River City Consultants
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
ACY
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M-2012-050 <br /> September 9, 2019 <br /> Page 2 <br /> American Datum (NAD) 1927, NAD 1983, or WGS 84, and the applicable zone, measured in <br /> meters. <br /> Please depict the proposed amendment area in addition to the currently permitted site on a map. <br /> Response: Legal description updated,main entrance location updated on both Exhibit A and Exhibit B <br /> using latitude/longitude in WGS 84 Datum, Exhibit B and B-2 updated and attached. <br /> 6.4.3 EXHIBIT C - Pre-mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands <br /> One or more maps may be necessary to legibly portray the following information: <br /> The Division recommends conveying this information on several maps (Structure Owners,adjacent <br /> land owners, mine features, etc.) Response: this has been split into 2 maps,C-1 and C-2, also <br /> plotted on larger scale <br /> The requirements below apply to both the proposed AM-1 boundary as well as the existing permit <br /> boundary. Maps should depict both areas.The existing permit boundary has largely not been <br /> addressed. Response: Maps combine existing boundaries with AM-1 <br /> Please include a legend for features. Using multiple colors would make the map more legible <br /> Response: Legend added <br /> Include a polygon/buffer line to delineate where 200 feet from the affected lands boundary is <br /> Response: added <br /> (a) all adjoining surface owners of record; <br /> Please state the owner of D Road and 33 Road Response: Note Added that all named streets are <br /> owned by Mesa County. <br /> Adjacent landowners of existing permit area not addressed. Response:Added <br /> (b) the name and location of all creeks, roads, buildings, oil and gas wells and lines, and power <br /> and communication lines on the area of affected land and within two hundred (200) feet of <br /> all boundaries of such area; <br /> Without a 200 ft.buffer this is difficult to determine if adequately addressed for AM-1 proposed area. <br /> Response:Added buffer line and showed all owners around existing area and AM-1 area <br /> Scale/size of map for existing permit area too small to read. Response:All maps plotted on larger <br /> scale for clarity <br /> (c) the existing topography of the area with contour lines of sufficient detail to portray the <br /> direction and rate of slope of the affected land; <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.