Laserfiche WebLink
35. On Page E-1, Table E-I Reclamation Areas indicates 13.6 acres of undisturbed land. Please <br /> revise the Exhibit F-I map to indicate the undisturbed lands. <br /> See the revised Map F-1. <br /> Exhibit F -Reclamation Plan Map <br /> 36. The Exhibit F-I map indicates a purple line with two dashes approximately 300 offset from <br /> the proposed permit boundary. The line type is not identified on the map legend. Please <br /> explain this discrepancy and update the map and/or map legend accordingly. <br /> Please see the revised Map F-1. <br /> Exhibit G- Water Information <br /> On Page G-1, the Applicant states the proposed mine site is within the 100 year flood plain <br /> of the West Fork of Clear Creek. In the event of a significant flood event(100 year flood) it <br /> is likely the proposed mine site would be captured by the West Fork of Clear Creek. Where <br /> mining will occur within 400 feet of the river channel, a flood analysis and flood control <br /> plan must be evaluated and submitted for Division review and acceptance. <br /> The flood analysis should quantify the velocity and volume offlows expected on site from a <br /> 100 year flood event, as well as the elevation of the 100 year base flood event and its <br /> relation to the elevation of any proposed spillways and embankments. The flood control plan <br /> should address mitigation measures including pit side armoring, river side armoring, inflow <br /> and outflow channels, or other appropriate measures. <br /> The Applicant shall provide the flood elevations to be expected under a "worst case" <br /> flooding scenario and specific mitigation measures to be implemented to minimize the <br /> potential for any offsite impacts. <br /> Riverside berms are proposed in the Douglas Mountain Mine application amendment, which <br /> may be prone to erosion during a flood event. The potential for "berms"around gravel pits <br /> to be damaged during flooding is discussed in detail in the 1987 Urban Drainage and Flood <br /> Control District (UDFCD) Publication "Technical Review Guidelines for Gravel Mining <br /> Activities within or Adjacent to 100 year Floodplains."Strips of native ground or <br /> constructed fill between the stream and the gravel pit, and generally aligned with the flow <br /> direction of the river are referred to in the UDFCD document as riverside berms. <br /> Engineered inflow and outflow structures are intended to mitigate possible slope failure <br /> during flood events for these berms. The Douglas Mountain Mine is outside of the <br /> jurisdictional boundaries of the UDFCD, however the technical floodplain factors which led <br /> to the formation of the UDFCD guidance publication still apply and will be used to review <br /> the adequacy of the flood mitigation structures proposed for the site. <br /> Please provide a flood analysis and flood control plan satisfying the requirements of the <br /> UDFCD for the expected 100 year flood event during the life of the operation and after final <br /> reclamation for the Douglas Mountain Mine. <br /> A flood analysis is attached. <br /> Db1R aline AM-01 8 (.ng LVw Wk,am)1ssocul",PI l 1 <br />