My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-07-05_PERMIT FILE - M2017012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2017012
>
2017-07-05_PERMIT FILE - M2017012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2020 11:28:41 AM
Creation date
7/5/2017 4:01:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2017012
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/5/2017
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Amazonite Mining
To
DRMS
Email Name
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HARD ROCK/ METAL MINING <br /> LIMITED IMPACT OPERATION ( 110 (2) ) <br /> RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION <br /> 6.3.2 EXHIBIT B —SITE DESCRIPTION <br /> (Revised June 29, 2017) <br /> 6.3.2 (d) Colorado Parks and Wildlife, Southeast Region,Area 14, District 281, Wildlife <br /> Manager Tim Kroening has been notified. No critical or important wildlife <br /> habitats or wildlife species will be impacted by the proposed operation. Per the <br /> Colorado Parks and Wildlife letter to DRMS dated May 16, 2017 regarding this <br /> permit their recommendations will be followed. More specifically, and as stated <br /> in that letter, the following recommendations are noted: <br /> CPW suggests care be taken during mining to avoid excess erosion or <br /> disturbance of more land than necessary to accomplish the project. We also <br /> suggest the area be reasonably reclaimed following mining. We recommend <br /> reusing the original top soil that is removed from the surface by placing it back in <br /> its original location after mining is completed. Once the original top soil is in <br /> place, we recommend planting the disturbed areas with native vegetation that <br /> matches the native vegetation already present in the surrounding area. <br /> CPW recommends the development and implementation of a noxious weed <br /> control plan for the site. It is recommended that all disturbed soils in the area be <br /> monitored for noxious weeds and noxious weeds should be actively controlled <br /> until native plant revegetation and reclamation is achieved. It is recommended <br /> that all areas disturbed by the development be revegetated with native plant <br /> species. <br /> If fill material will be used in the project, CPW recommends using a native fill <br /> material that would be conducive to growing native vegetation. Non-native <br /> vegetation can out-compete native vegetation and thus degrade valuable <br /> wildlife habitat. <br /> CPW also recommends that at each trench a gradual slope be in place leading <br /> out.This would allow any wildlife that happens to fall in the trenches to escape <br /> with ease. <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.