My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-10-21_REPORT - M1980244 (31)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-10-21_REPORT - M1980244 (31)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2017 10:52:55 AM
Creation date
12/22/2016 8:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/21/2016
Doc Name
SGVLF Phase I Cert Report - 0 Completion Report
From
CC&V
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR87
Email Name
TC1
AME
ERR
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cripple Creek & Victor Gold Mining Company <br />Squaw Gulch VLF Phase 1 Completion <br />Record of Construction Report <br />475.0106.006 <br />October 14, 2016 <br /> <br />P:\Projects\0106.006 CC&V CQA and EDS\J‐REPORTS\ROC Report\475.0106.006 CCV PHASE 1 ROC REPORT ‐ FINAL161014.DOCX <br /> Page 15 <br />and 4, respectively. All destructive testing was performed by ECA in the presence of the <br />CQA Monitor. No destructive tests failed within the Squaw Gulch Phase 1 Completion <br />area. Fusion and Extrusion Destructive Testing Summaries are presented in Appendix <br />J.5.1 and Appendix J.5.2, respectively, and the tensiometer certifications are presented <br />in Appendix L. <br />3.4.6. Geomembrane Pressure Testing <br />Pressure testing was performed to ensure all fusion welded seams had continuity <br />throughout their entire length. The ends of the seam were sealed and the air channel in <br />the seam was pressurized using a small air compressor to a minimum of 30 pounds per <br />square inch (psi), for a minimum of five minutes. A pressure gauge and needle were <br />used to monitor the air pressure in the seam. If the pressure dropped less than 3 psi, the <br />opposite end of the seam from the pressure gauge was cut. If the needle dropped, <br />continuity was confirmed throughout entire seam length and the test was considered <br />“passing.” If a pressure drop of more than 3 psi occurred or the continuity was not <br />proven, smaller sections of the seam were tested to delineate the failing section of the <br />seam. All failing seams or portions of seams were repaired and vacuum tested. The <br />Geomembrane Seam Pressure Testing Summary is presented in Appendix J.6. <br />3.4.7. Geomembrane Defects and Repairs <br />The CQA Monitor constantly inspected the geomembrane for defects from the time it <br />was deployed to DCF placement. All defects were marked with a defect number by the <br />CQA Monitor and consisted of any item which a repair was necessary to create a <br />continuously sealed geomembrane layer. Repairs were performed using the extrusion <br />welding method and patches extended at least 6‐inches past the defect in all directions. <br />All repairs were assigned a repair number and cross checked with defect numbers to <br />ensure all defects were repaired. <br />All repairs and extrusion welded seams were non‐destructively tested using a vacuum <br />box. The area being tested was covered in soapy water and the vacuum box was sealed <br />to the geomembrane. A vacuum was pulled over the area for at least 10 seconds and if <br />no bubbles were present the test passed. If bubbles were present the area failed and <br />was marked as a defect. The repair process would then be repeated for the failing <br />vacuum test. Vacuum tests overlapped each other by a minimum of 3‐inches. The <br />Geomembrane Defect/Repair Summary, including vacuum testing logs, is presented in <br />Appendix J.7.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.