My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-08-25_REPORT - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2016-08-25_REPORT - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2016 9:14:40 AM
Creation date
8/30/2016 8:49:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
8/25/2016
Doc Name
Subsidence Monitoring Report
From
Wright Water Engineers, Inc
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2016
Permit Index Doc Type
Subsidence Report
Email Name
LDS
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Spring 2016 Subsidence and Geologic Field Observations <br />South of Divide and Dry Fork Mininq Areas <br />I <br />Figure 3. Northward view of a nearly continuous differential settlement crack on the MVB E6-12 pad. <br />Longwall mining had not occurred beneath this area at the time of our spring 2016 field visit. <br />Further west along this traverse, the subsidence crack previously reported near the hairpin curve <br />between MVB E5-12/13 and E5-14 is no longer evident in the road and can only be identified by <br />a highly weathered crack on the cut slope side of the road. Regrading has played a significant part <br />in removing the subsidence crack previously visible in the road. <br />Given that longwall mining had not yet occurred beneath the E6-8/9 through E6-11 MVB pads, <br />visits to these locations were performed to assess the conditions prior to mining. As a result, there <br />were no subsidence features observed in association with these pads. Differential settlement <br />cracks were observed on the north edge of the MVB E6-10 pad in the area of greatest fill (see <br />Figure 4). Another area of cracking was observed along the road east of the MVB E6-10 pad. <br />This location is discussed in more detail below as Location 2. <br />831-032.798 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 14 <br />August 2016 <br />�k = <br />Figure 3. Northward view of a nearly continuous differential settlement crack on the MVB E6-12 pad. <br />Longwall mining had not occurred beneath this area at the time of our spring 2016 field visit. <br />Further west along this traverse, the subsidence crack previously reported near the hairpin curve <br />between MVB E5-12/13 and E5-14 is no longer evident in the road and can only be identified by <br />a highly weathered crack on the cut slope side of the road. Regrading has played a significant part <br />in removing the subsidence crack previously visible in the road. <br />Given that longwall mining had not yet occurred beneath the E6-8/9 through E6-11 MVB pads, <br />visits to these locations were performed to assess the conditions prior to mining. As a result, there <br />were no subsidence features observed in association with these pads. Differential settlement <br />cracks were observed on the north edge of the MVB E6-10 pad in the area of greatest fill (see <br />Figure 4). Another area of cracking was observed along the road east of the MVB E6-10 pad. <br />This location is discussed in more detail below as Location 2. <br />831-032.798 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. Page 14 <br />August 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.