My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-07-21_REVISION - M1980244 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-07-21_REVISION - M1980244 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 3:35:57 PM
Creation date
7/22/2016 8:02:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/21/2016
Doc Name
Technical Review
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR79
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical Memorandum <br /> Cripple Creek&Victor Gold Mine ■ <br /> Stability Evaluation for Arequa Gulch VLF—Mill Solution Injection Program <br /> NewFields Job No.475.0106.008 <br /> July 12,2016 <br /> ➢ Baseline condition— No active solution injection <br /> Solution injection with a saturation plume initiating 10-feet below the ore surface and <br /> percolating downward with either a 50-feet or 100-feet width <br /> Although wicking of mill solution upwards around the wells is highly unlikely give the particle <br /> size characteristics of the ore, we evaluated the saturation level at only 10-feet below the <br /> surface as an added level of conservatism. The width of the saturation plume was selected <br /> based on the results of the Hydro-JexT"" injection program evaluation (AMEC, 2009). The <br /> evaluation indicated that pressurized injection of solution at half of the overburden pressure <br /> resulted in a vertical saturation plume from the injection point to the base liner with an <br /> approximate 50-feet in width. The saturation plumes considered for this evaluation are <br /> reasonable, and likely conservative, for a non-pressurized injection program. <br /> 2.4 Results <br /> Results of the stability evaluation are listed in the following table and output graphics from the <br /> stability models are included as attachments. <br /> SCENARIO FACTOR OF <br /> SAFETY <br /> No Injection 1.56 <br /> 50-foot Wide Plume 1.45 <br /> 100-Foot Wide PluT±_j 1.36 <br /> The results indicate the facility slopes are stable, and the calculated factors of safety are <br /> acceptable considering the minimum acceptable factor of safety for static conditions has been <br /> established as 1.3 for the project site. The results confirm that the spatial extent of the <br /> saturation plume from the injection program influences the calculated factor of safety; as the <br /> saturation plume expands towards the exterior slope the factor of safety decreases. Although <br /> the ore was modeled as saturated at approximately 10-feet below the existing surface around <br /> the injection wells, this scenario is highly unlikely given the perforations in each well initiate at <br /> 20-feet below the surface and actual factors of safety are probable slightly higher. <br /> 3.0 DISCUSSION <br /> The current stability evaluation addressed the influence of the proposed mill solution injection <br /> program on the stability of the AGVLF Phase IV slopes. The impact of introducing solution into <br /> the heap under hydrostatic conditions reduces the calculated factors of safety, but does not <br /> result in unacceptable or unsafe conditions. <br /> Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.