My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-07-21_REVISION - M1980244 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-07-21_REVISION - M1980244 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2020 3:35:57 PM
Creation date
7/22/2016 8:02:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/21/2016
Doc Name
Technical Review
From
Newmont
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR79
Email Name
TC1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Technical Memorandum <br /> Cripple Creek&Victor Gold Mine ■ <br /> Stability Evaluation for Arequa Gulch VLF—Mill Solution Injection Program <br /> NewFields Job No.475.0106.008 <br /> July 12,2016 <br /> 2.0 STABILITY EVALUATION <br /> 2.1 Model Development <br /> A section orientated perpendicular to the AGVLF slopes at each well location was reviewed. <br /> Based on the review, it was determined that no significant differences existing between the two <br /> locations and only the section at well #1002 was selected for the stability evaluation. The <br /> orientation of the stability section is noted on Figure 1. <br /> The base grades beneath the facility were based on the as-built grading contours and the <br /> existing VLF slopes were based on an aerial survey performed in October, 2015. <br /> Outside the influence of the injection wells, the phreatic surface was modeled at three feet <br /> over the base liner. The wells are sited outside of the Phase IV process solution storage area <br /> (PSSA), and thus ponded solution at the base of the facility is not expected beneath the wells. <br /> 2.2 Material Properties <br /> Material properties selected for the stability evaluation were consistent with previous <br /> evaluations at the site and our understanding and experience with these materials. All material <br /> properties used in the stability models are summarized in the following table. <br /> UNIT WEIGHT FRICTION COHESION <br /> MATERIAL (Ib/ft3) ANGLE(deg) (lb/ft2) <br /> Ore 120 39 0 <br /> Liner Interface 115 18 0 <br /> Foundation 125 40 0 <br /> 2.3 Saturation of Ore from Injection Wells <br /> Given the coarse nature of the ore materials and estimated hydraulic conductivities, it is <br /> expected that all mill solution introduced to the wells will percolate downward. There is likely <br /> some stratification within the heap between lifts that would influence the vertical hydraulic <br /> conductivity and subsequently the radius of influence around the well. The influence of the <br /> saturation radius around the well on the overall stability was evaluated through a parametric <br /> study. <br /> The worst case scenario in regards to slope stability would be saturation of the ore near the <br /> surface of the heap from the injection program. The following conceptual models were <br /> considered for the stability evaluation: <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.