My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-07-14_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2016010
>
2016-07-14_PERMIT FILE - M2016010 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2021 10:56:21 AM
Creation date
7/20/2016 12:14:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2016010
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
7/14/2016
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Response
From
Transit-Mix Concrete Co.
To
DRMS
Email Name
AME
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
191
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transit Mix Concrete Co. <br /> 6. Comment: Please provide the SLOPE/W slope stability analysis data from the Norwest <br /> overall slope analysis to allow the Division to duplicate the analysis with Clover <br /> Technology's Galena software for verification purposes. <br /> Response: Modelling inputs are provided in the Exhibit 6.5 addendum. <br /> 7. Comment: Please provide the SLOPE/W slope stability analysis models for all conditions <br /> for the bench scale analysis from the Norwest analysis to allow the Division to duplicate the <br /> analysis with Clover Technology's Galena software for verification purposes. <br /> Response: Modelling inputs and an AutoCAD file of the region boundaries are provided <br /> on the attached CD. <br /> 8. Comment: Please provide justification for the Phi angle value of 0 degrees used in the <br /> Norwest SLOPE/W slope stability analysis. <br /> Response: The author assumes you are referring to the Phi-B value shown on the <br /> SLOPE/W outputs in Appendix H of the pit wall memorandum. Phi-B is related to <br /> suction and can represent additional strength due to matric suction in soils. This <br /> parameter has been set to zero degrees for the pit wall stability analysis (i.e.,saturated <br /> or near saturated condition). <br /> 9. Comment: Please provide justification for the circular failure analysis instead of a wedge <br /> failure analysis used in the Norwest SLOPE/W slope stability analysis. <br /> Response: Rock slope failure mechanisms become similar to those encountered in soil <br /> when there are no dominant or preferred directions of weakness plane.Without the <br /> presence of large-scale structural features to define failure wedges within the pit walls, <br /> the circular failure analysis is deemed to be acceptable. <br /> The west fault is near vertical and oriented perpendicular to the pit walls. It is also a <br /> narrow (less than 2ft) and tight fault zone where is intersects pit walls and so is not <br /> anticipated to create stability issues. The west fault does cut through the east wall of <br /> the North Pit, nearly parallel to the pit wall. However, due to the orientation and <br /> characteristics of the fault combined with the strength of the rock mass within the pit <br /> wall area it is not expected to create a stability concern. <br /> 10. Comment: As recommended in Section 6.3 of the Norwest Geotechnical Assessment- Rev. <br /> B, dated January 26, 2015, please commit to conducting further geotechnical assessments <br /> during the initial quarry development to evaluate pit wall design performance and wall <br /> angles. <br /> Response: See Transit Mix memorandum included in Exhibit 6.5. <br /> Hitch Rack Ranch Quarry (M-2016-010) <br /> Response to Comments—July 14, 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.