My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-07-06_REVISION - M1980244 (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980244
>
2016-07-06_REVISION - M1980244 (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:26:30 PM
Creation date
7/7/2016 11:15:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
7/6/2016
From
CC Victor Gold Mining Co.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AR3
Email Name
TC1
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In early June, 2016, I received a letter from you indicating that CC&V Mining was requesting <br /> that acreage in the Cripple Creek mining area be released to them for use at the Cresson Project. <br /> No further explanation was provided, and again the area to be affected was referred to as <br /> Township 15 South, Range 69 West, 6 h Principal Meridian in Teller County. This time you <br /> added that the area in question was located at or near Section 30. A glance at my maps showed <br /> me that Section 30 of the Township and Range in question was located north of Victor and west <br /> of Goldfield,well away from my property. <br /> Then, on July 2, I received another letter from you dated June 27 regarding the acreage release. <br /> The information again indicated the area affected would be at or near Section 30, Township 15 <br /> South, Range 69 West, 6 h Principal Meridian. Included in your letter was information on the <br /> permit application from CC&V Mining. This time,Section 20 in the designated township and <br /> range was specified as being affected in some of the letter content. This was the first reference <br /> to something other than Section 30 and increased haul road activity. The area in question was <br /> described as 2 miles southeast of Cripple Creek and 1.25 miles north of Victor. The process <br /> described was open pit mining, ore haulage to the processing area,the processing to be in valley <br /> leach or mill processing. This is the first notice I received that the amendment entailed a request <br /> other than increased haul road traffic—indeed the amendment requested the building of heap <br /> leach and processing facilities. <br /> Also included in your most recent letter was a request from Newmont Mining asking for the <br /> release of 35.2 acres in the Goldfield area and 7.7 acres in the Squaw Gulch/Gold Run area. <br /> Newmont claimed an inability to secure legal right to enter certain lands in the area. I point out I <br /> was never contacted by CC&V Mining or Newmont Mining regarding my specific property in <br /> Goldfield. I notice that my name and address are included in the information about land owners <br /> to be affected by the Newmont request. I repeat that no one from CC&V or Newmont ever <br /> contacted me regarding the use of my property for their new heap leach operation and processing <br /> facility, so their claim that they were unable to secure legal right to enter my property does not <br /> ring true—in fact it is mendacity—a prevarication. <br /> Upon inspecting the attached very small scale map, I determined that their request to build the <br /> heap leach and processing facility literally abuts my property—if it does not indeed usurp it. The <br /> previous correspondence from either CC&V/Newmont or you has been misleading. The <br /> amendment is actually going to affect land located in Sections 20, 21, 28, and 29—not the <br /> aforementioned Section 30. Newmont and CC&V have never contacted me to discuss acquiring <br /> the property from me so that they could use it. <br /> My property includes approximately 2 acres above the Goldfield Arena. It includes an historic <br /> log cabin surrounded by a grove of aspen trees. I lived in that cabin in the 1970s. I installed <br /> electricity in the summer of 2015. Black Hills Energy has designated the property as 101 West <br /> 9t' Street in Goldfield. I have had the property for more than 41 years, and had planned to follow <br /> the procedure to obtain permission to install City of Victor water and construct a septic system to <br /> accommodate a habitable structure on the property. In addition,there is a grove of old and large <br /> pine trees close to the CC&V/Newmont request boundary. Will they destroy these old trees? <br /> The property commands an excellent view of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains—one of the <br /> reasons why I chose this lad when I acquired it in 1975. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.