Laserfiche WebLink
Rob Zuber <br />Page 10 <br />April 20, 2016 <br />Please update Map 10B to show all areas of Quaternary Alluvium within the proposed permit <br />area and comment on any differences in spatial extent between this layer and the layer shown <br />on Map 7A as Qv (valley fill deposits). <br />This item is addressed under item 82. <br />The response is sufficient. <br />Rule 4.05.13 — Surface and Ground Water Monitorin <br />84. The response is sufficient. <br />85. The response is sufficient. <br />86. Five alluvial monitoring wells are proposed with PR -4. Their approximate locations are shown in <br />Figure 1 as pink symbols with green labels; the red polygon represents the approximate outline <br />of the proposed Collom pit. The completion information for these wells is provided in Exhibit 26, <br />Item 1, and is satisfactory. <br />No upgradient monitoring wells are proposed, since, as is explained in Volume 15, Rule 4, Page <br />14, shallow groundwater is not present upgradient of the proposed Collom pit. With this in <br />mind, impacts will be assessed relative to baseline data only. <br />The only proposed monitoring point on Little Collom Gulch (MLC -04-01) is located more than 3 <br />miles downgradient of the proposed pit. The time taken for affected water to travel between <br />the proposed pit and the MLC -04-01 may be roughly estimated using an equation for average <br />linear velocity from Fetter (reference 3 below): <br />Kdh <br />_ <br />vx nedl <br />Assuming: <br />Hydraulic conductivity, K = 3 ft/day (ref. table 2.04.7-40) <br />Hydraulic gradient, dh/dl = -0.04 (equal to the average surface gradient estimated from <br />map 10B ((6540-7300)/18,500) <br />Effective porosity, ne = 25% <br />The average linear velocity, vx, would be around 0.5 ft/day, at which rate the time taken for <br />impacted water to reach the monitoring point location would be over a hundred years. This <br />estimate is only as accurate as the estimated hydraulic conductivity, which is notoriously <br />difficult to measure accurately; nevertheless, the point is that a single, distant, monitoring point <br />would yield very little information about the impacts of the Collom pit on downgradient water <br />quality. A sequence of monitoring points, much closer to the disturbance would allow for the <br />monitoring of any future contaminant plume, as well as the extent of natural attenuation over <br />time and distance. Furthermore, well tests at these new locations would improve the accuracy <br />and precision of the aquifer properties, and allow for an improved prediction of the PHC. <br />