My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-11-07_REVISION - M2010049
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2010049
>
2015-11-07_REVISION - M2010049
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:33:17 PM
Creation date
12/9/2015 7:46:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010049
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/7/2015
Doc Name
Application AM01
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
PSH
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Varra Companies, Inc. <br /> OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS <br /> 8120 Gage Street Frederick,CO 80516 Telephone(303)666-6657 Fax(303)666-6743 <br /> The original determination of the Office ignored several references within the original <br /> permit and attending adequacy reviewstatements that clearly specify Developed Water <br /> Resources as part of the mixed use reclamation planned for the site. Further, we had <br /> established a practice of submitting Technical Revisions for matters of this kind, as the <br /> Applicant has sufficient waters to reclaim these basins in either a lined or an unlined <br /> state, and provided the necessary assurances of committed water resources sufficient <br /> to support this statement. This condition of abundant water resources, places the <br /> Applicant in a situation unique in this industry, and affords us flexibility from which <br /> considerations by Technical Revision were considered sufficient prior to this <br /> circumstance and opinion of the Office. <br /> Regardless, in light of that decision, we have closely examined the statements made in <br /> the original permit and attending adequacy review letters that lead us to believe the <br /> decision on the part of the Office to deny our Technical Revision ignored the stated <br /> intent of the original permit. Furthermore, that decision did injury and harm both to the <br /> contract, which is the permit, and to the Applicant who is party to that contract. So <br /> while the Amendment is now in the hands of the Office, the circumstances attending to <br /> the evidence and facts of the permit up to that time should be set forth to benchmark <br /> the matter. as follows: <br /> Taken from page 1 of the OMLR 'Lined Pit Guide — September 2000:' <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> It has become a common practice to reclaim gravel pits to a developed water <br /> resource land use through the installation of clay pit liners or slurry walls. The <br /> purpose of these installations is to isolate the constructed water storage reservoir <br /> from the surrounding ground water system. <br /> Please Note: Nothing in the guidelines requires the designation of`Developed Water <br /> Resource land use to be either 'Primary' or the 'Singular' use designation. <br /> Taken from page 13 of the OMLR'Lined Pit Guide — September 2000:' <br /> PERMITTING OPTIONS <br /> Frequently, the process of permitting a gravel pit and lined reservoir project <br /> precedes the design phase making it difficult and costly to prepare and application <br /> that will qualify for the regulated construction option and the reduced bond <br /> amount. The following list describes permitting mechanisms that may be <br /> employed to allow application approval prior to design and specification <br /> preparation and preserve the option to post the reduced bond amount available <br /> under the regulated construction option. <br /> Varra Companies, Inc. Western Sugar Land Development Project 2 <br /> OMLR Permit #: M-2010-049 Amendment 7 December 2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.