Laserfiche WebLink
Julia Keedy <br />Bromley Lakes SWSP <br />April 8, 2015 <br />Page 6 <br />• The period of the HCU analysis was 1942 to 1981. The study period is accepted by the <br />SEO for this SWSP period, however for any future SWSP request the study period <br />should be extended through present. If the 50 Polly Mann shares where were used by <br />others in SWSPs those years can be excluded from the extended analysis. <br />• The historical consumptive use was estimated using the Modified Blaney - Criddle <br />methodology with the TR21 crop coefficients in the StateCU Consumptive Use Model. <br />• Soil Conservation Service methodology for calculation of effective precipitation. <br />• Assumed ditch loss of 20 percent <br />• Available water storage capacity was estimated at 0.10 in /in <br />• Temperature and precipitation data from the Fort Lupton 2 SE station (ID 3207) and <br />Brighton 1 N station (ID 0950). <br />• A maximum irrigation efficiency value of 65% was assumed. <br />• The assumed irrigation efficiency will be accepted for this SWSP plan period; however <br />any renewal request must provide information to support the claimed efficiency, <br />including the,type of flood irrigation, soil properties, aerial photos, slopes, irrigation <br />practices, technical references etc. <br />• The historically irrigated lands were based on 46.1 acres of irrigation evenly split <br />between alfalfa, corn, and pasture grass. For purposes of this SWSP the irrigated area <br />and crop split will be accepted, however any future SWSP must provide documentation to <br />support these assumptions. <br />• For the irrigation water historically applied to the farm, a portion ran off the fields <br />(surface return) and a portion seeped into the ground below the root zone of crops (deep <br />percolation). Irrigation return flows were distributed with 67 percent attributed to deep <br />percolation and 33 percent to surface runoff based upon conditions evidenced during site <br />visits, discussions with irrigators and ditch company personnel, and a review of other <br />studies and change cases within the basin. The surface runoff (tailwater) return flows <br />are assumed to return to the South Platte River during the same month of diversion and <br />thus they were not tagged to the river. The deep percolation was lagged to the river <br />using the same AWAS software and the -following aquifer parameters: <br />Distance from the centroid to the river (X) = 1,500 feet <br />Alluvial aquifer width (W) = 18,500 feet <br />Transmissivity (T) = 100,000 gallons per day per foot <br />Specific Yield (S) = 0.2 <br />Return flows associated with ditch loss were not included in this analysis since these <br />losses will continue as water is conveyed through the ditch to the pit. <br />Over a 40- year study period, the average pro rata diversion for the Polly Mann property <br />was 179.2 acre -feet per year, which translates to a historic farm headgate delivery of 143.3 acre <br />feet per year, or 2.87 acre -feet per share per year. In total, the historic consumptive use for <br />the Polly Mann property was found to be 87.2 acre -feet per year, or 1.74 acre -feet per share per <br />year. The surface water, or tailwater, runoff averaged 18.7 acre -feet per year and the deep <br />percolation runoff averaged 37.5 acre -feet per year. The total return flows represent <br />approximately 39% of the historical farm headgate delivery, or 1.12 acre -feet per share. The <br />total farm headgate, return flows and net stream depletions associated with the RMCC's <br />eleven shares used on the Tower Farm are presented on the attached Table 3B. <br />