2015-04-22_HYDROLOGY - M1987049 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Julia Keedy Bromley Lakes SWSP April 8, 2015 Arends Farm Five of the RMCC's 16 remaining Fulton Ditc Arends Farm along with 25 other Fulton Ditch shares. Pines North in case no. 2009CW279. The decreed in c use of 105 Fulton Ditch shares. The five shares used original historical consumptive use ( "HCU ") analysis 1 1950 through 1985, but were not changed. In 1986 th Aggregate. You indicated that you do not have any it of the five shares from 1986 to 2005. After 2005 RMC You submitted a copy of the engineering reps dated May 2012 prepared by William Warmack from decree in that case relied on the Applegate Report r change of use of the 105 Fulton Ditch shares. Althou farm depletions for the 105 Fulton Ditch shares as 1 8.4.4 of the decree in case no. 2009CW279 the histc averaged 1.83 acre -feet per share (191.9 acre -feet) in order to determine the HCU credits attributable t 1950 through 1985 you used the depletion pattern a case no. 2009CW279 and included zeros in HCU for t in an annual on -farm depletion of 1.14 acre - feet /sh Based upon the decreed return flow factors, the hiss shares averaged 2.91 acre - feet /share and the returr order to determine the return flows associated with values were multiplied by 163.2 percent (which reps result in an average on -farm depletion of 1.14 acre - averaged 1.77 acre - feet /share. The total farm head depletions associated with the RMCC's five share usi the attached Table 3A. Tower Farm Page 5 hshares were historically used on the The 25 shares were changed by Castle ase no. 2009CW279 actually changed the )n the Arends Farm were part of the ) erformed for case no. 2009CW279, from e 5 shares were sold to Henderson formation at this time regarding the use C started using the five shares in SWSPs. rt ( "Report ") in case no. 2009CW279, Applegate Group ( "Applegate "). The �garding the HCU assumptions for the h the Report determined the annual on 4.8 acre -feet, according to paragraph ical net depletions of the shares Therefore, for the purpose of this SWSP RMCC's five shares fo -r the period of d return flow factors from the decree in ie period of 1986 to 2005. This resulted re, as shown on the attached Table 3A. )rical farm headgate delivery of the flows averaged 1.09 acre- feet /share. In :he 5 shares the decreed return flow sent the percentage increase that would eet /share). The increased return flows ate, return flows and net stream d on the Arends Farm are presented on RMCC's remaining 11 shares were historically used along with 34 other Fulton Ditch shares on the lands which include the South and North Tower Pits and adjacent property directly south of the Bromley Lakes site. RMCC acquired the 11 Fulton Ditch shares in 1992 from Platte River Farms and they were intended to be used as an augmentation source for the North Tower Pit, as described in case no. 90CW039. (Platte River Farm purchased the North Tower Pit property and the Fulton shares from Adams Aggregate, Inc. in early 1992 along with additional lands to the south and an additional 34 Fulton Ditch shares. in total 45 Fulton Ditch shares were historically used on the Tower property. (You indicated that complete ownership and historic use data for the 45 shares used at the Toyver property were found to be incomplete. Based on previous research historic irrigation may have exceeded 200 acres. An analysis of 50 Fulton Ditch shares used on the Polly Mann property aInd the historical use analysis performed in OOCW202 and 01 CW258 show that Fulton Ditch shares were typically issued on the basis of about 1 acre of irrigated land per share. Therefore it is likely that there were once more shares used on the Tower property or that the 45 shares were notfused to irrigate the full property. Given the lack of detailed information for 11 Tower shares lowned by RMCC, for the purposes of this SWSP, you proposed to use the consumptive use and return flow factors that were presented in the MEtG Pit (M1986 -079) SWSP for the 50 Polly Mann shares using the following assumptions.