Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Williams <br />Page 2 <br />March 3, 2015 <br />cubic yards of Biocompost. Therefore, the financial warranty calculation must reflect the cost <br />for importing 232 cubic yards of Biocompost. Please respond. <br />4. The Revised Reclamation Plan and Reclamation Plan Maps state the maximum gradient of <br />the reclaimed slopes will be 4H:1 V. However, the response to the Division's Preliminary <br />Adequacy Review Letter states the slopes would be reclaimed to 3H:1 V. Please clarify what <br />the final grade of the reclaimed slopes will be. <br />5. The Reclamation Plan Maps show the existing driveway will remain following final <br />reclamation of the site. In addition, the map states the driveway will be surfaced with 1/2" — 3" <br />of natural gravel. Please describe the measures which will be taken to reclaim the driveway <br />and specify the source of the gravel to be used on the driveway. <br />6. The Division will provide the Applicant with the financial warranty estimate once all of the <br />adequacy issues have been addressed. <br />6.3.5 Exhibit E — Map <br />7. The Reclamation Plan Map labeled `P -4' does not have a labeled permit boundary. In <br />addition, the map scale is defined as 1" = 40'. Pursuant to Rule 6.2.1(2)(e), the acceptable <br />range of map scales shall not be larger than 1" = 50' nor smaller than 1" = 660'. Please revise <br />the Reclamation Plan Map to include a labeled permit boundary and the appropriate map <br />scale. <br />8. The Reclamation Plan Map labeled `P -4' appears to be a photocopy of the original map. The <br />version submitted to the Division did not include a legible title. Please submit a revised copy <br />of this map with a legible title. <br />9. The Reclamation Plan Map labeled `P -4' depicts the location of the stormwater control <br />structures. The location of the stormwater control structures is unclear. Please revise the map <br />using separate and distinct symbols for each of the stormwater control structures and include <br />an appropriate legend. <br />10. The Applicant provided proof of mailing of notices to adjacent landowners as required by <br />Rule 1.6.2(1)(e). However, the owners of record of all land surface within 200 feet of the - <br />boundary of the affected land who were noticed do not correspond to the owners of record <br />that are depicted on the Mining Plan Map. Please revise the owners of record on the Mining <br />Plan Map to correspond to the owners of record who were noticed of the proposed operation. <br />6.3.6 Exhibit F — List of Other Permits and Licenses Required <br />11. The Applicant has stated the mine tailings from the proposed operation will be processed at <br />the Federal Mill. In addition, the Applicant has stated that a permit from CDPHE is not <br />