My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-02-06_HYDROLOGY - P2014019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Prospect
>
P2014019
>
2015-02-06_HYDROLOGY - P2014019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:57:17 PM
Creation date
2/17/2015 4:28:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
P2014019
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
2/6/2015
Doc Name
NOI Application Release
From
Greg Lewicki and Associates, PLLC
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Based on the data shown above, approximately 0.4 -1.5 CFS of water has flowed from the mine <br />historically. Therefore, a baseline flow of 1.5 CFS is proposed for flow comparison during NOI <br />activity. <br />The project manager and all workers in the project will be trained as to the importance of <br />maintaining the water quality of the existing flows from the mine. As explained in the previous <br />response, erosion waddles will be installed at each drill station and possible in the main mine <br />ditch. Full drill hole plug material will be available at every drill station so that if a hole is <br />producing water from fractures or any other source, the drill hole will be plugged if the flow is <br />found to exceed proposed baseline level of 1.5 CFS. <br />As daily field tests are taken for these parameters at the drill site underground and the mine <br />portal, they will be compared to these baseline levels and if there are any variations above 20 %, <br />a sample will be taken for full suite analysis and an immediate investigation will take place to <br />find the cause for the exceedance. The 20% value is used since there will be normal fluctuations <br />in parameters due to wet/dry years, seasonal fluctuations, etc. If it is seen that excess solids are, <br />leaving the drill station, or that conductivity levels are too high as determined by the 20% <br />variation, then immediate action will be taken to either improve sediment trapping, or in the <br />case of high conductivity or pH, the hole will be plugged immediately. <br />2.3 Receiving stream standards for Mosquito Creek... <br />The Hock Hocking Mine currently discharges into Lower Mosquito Creek. This creek drains into <br />the middle fork of the Platte River. Mosquito Creek is in the Upper South Platte River basin. The <br />stream segment of interest is Number 2b as listed in CDPHE Regulation Number 38 [1]. <br />Segment number 2b as defined in CDPHE Regulation Number 38 on stream classifications and <br />water quality standards for the South Platte River Basin, Laramie River Basin, Republican River <br />Basin, and the Smoky Hill River Basin was used to classify Mosquito Creek [1]. These <br />regulations are referred to as in- stream standards and are specific to the stream segment <br />applicable to the Hock Hocking Mine site. The values as defined in the numeric standards table <br />for Regulation No. 3 are shown below in Figure 2. <br />REGION: O AND <br />DESIG <br />--- .CATION. <br />NUMERIC <br />STANDARDS <br />TEMPORARY <br />MODIFICATIONS <br />BASIN: UPPER SOUTH PLATTE RIVER <br />PHYSICAL <br />srM <br />BIOLOGICAL <br />- ORGANIC <br />P19A <br />METALS <br />PWI <br />AND <br />WAUF6`RS <br />Sssam Segment Descsgpn <br />Zb. Matnslem of Mo.qudo Creek hom Fe <br />Aq We Cols 1 <br />T•T VS(CS -I) C <br />NH>(aUN)•NS <br />S :0 <br />As(ac)•0{D <br />r.(ch)-WS(d.) <br />Ni(Aekh)•TVS <br />T..W..y npb6calon <br />confluence wsh South Maequ it. CreeIt to ib <br />UP <br />Reaealwn E <br />D O. • 6.0 nqs <br />C@(ac)•00/9 <br />B•0.T3 <br />A.(N)•0.02(TreQ <br />Fe(ch)•1000(Trec) <br />Ss(eekh)•TVS <br />As(N)4)Ln0 <br />conf u.—.1h the Misde Fors of Ih. South <br />Water Surd! <br />00 (110-7 0 MP <br />Clich" 011 <br />NO2•0.05 <br />Cs(oc)•TVS(tr) <br />Pb(ackh)•TVS <br />Aq(x)•TVS <br />E�ratwn sale of 121!141. <br />P.a. R.— <br />Agseulty <br />PH - 6.5-9.0 <br />CN•0.005 <br />NOy.10 <br />Cs(N)•TVS <br />Mn(Wrh)•TVS <br />A9(ch )-TVS(tr) <br />E. COS•12fif100M <br />CI-250 <br />Cslgac)•50(Trec) <br />Mn(NI•WS(d.) <br />Zn(N) -Z20 <br />So,•WS <br />CNI(aNN)•TV$ <br />Hq(eh}0o1(To0 <br />cafoeleh)•TVS <br />Figure 2 - Numeric Standards Table for Regulation No. 38 [I ] <br />As shown in the figure above, this segment of Mosquito Creek is classified for Aquatic Life Cold <br />1, Recreation E, Water Supply, and Agriculture. Many of the water standards are based on the <br />Table Value Standards (TVS), and thus may require a hardness calculation. <br />Although many years of hardness data for Mosquito Creek downstream of the Hock Hocking Mine <br />exist, corresponding flow data is not always present. Extensive hardness data was available from <br />sampling location 5988 on the sampling location map shown in Figure 3. This data was collected <br />by two different agencies: the CDPHE and The Rivers of Colorado Water Watch Network (also <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.