My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-01-20_REPORT - C1981022
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981022
>
2015-01-20_REPORT - C1981022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:56:42 PM
Creation date
1/20/2015 10:25:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/20/2015
Doc Name
2011 and 2013 Annual Reclamation Report Review Memo
From
DRMS
To
Oxbow Mining, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
TNL
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tabetha Lynch, DRMS <br />Page 4 <br />January 20, 2015 <br />For 2011 and 2013, weed control activities were conducted on disturbed areas such as <br />road cuts, warehouse storage areas, pond outslopes, reclaimed borehole roads and <br />borehole pad- sties. A rill and gully survey was conducted 2011. <br />(f) As indicated above, Oxbow provides a list of all the areas seeded at the site, their <br />respective acreage and the year the area was seeded. <br />(2) No additional monitoring information was provided with the 2011 and 2013 report. <br />Based on the review discussed above, the Division has the following concerns: <br />A. The status reported for the disturbed areas in Exhibit 1 of the report is unclear. Many <br />disturbed area parcels are indicated to have been reclaimed; however upon further review, <br />many parcels have only been partially reclaimed as only portions of the disturbed area have <br />been reported to have been seeded. Oxbow should review the status of the areas reported <br />to have been "reclaimed ", and make clear under what land status these areas are <br />categorized, such as backfilled and graded and topsoiled, Oxbow should account for this <br />reclamation in the ARR as required by Rule 2.04.13. <br />B. According to the 2013 ARR, for the following parcels; GVB- LW9 -04, GVB- LW10 -02, GVB - <br />LW10-04, GV1311 -01A, GVB- LW16 -06, GVB- LW16 -07 and GVB- LW17 -09 the amount of <br />acres reported to have been seeded is greater than the acres reported to have been <br />disturbed. Oxbow needs to compare the acreage they have reported to have seeded to the <br />disturbed areas acreages for each of the parcels and fix any discrepancies. <br />C. According to the 2013 ARR, the following areas were reported to have been seeded, but do <br />not appear to correspond to any of the disturbed areas listed in Exhibit 1; <br />0 S. East Yard Coal Mine Waste Pile <br />0 8. A -1 Gulch <br />0 22. TC1 and TC2 Well <br />0 25. GVB- LW12 -03 pad <br />0 28. GVB - LW8 -02, 2800 feet of road <br />0 29. GVB- LW10 -OBC <br />o 32. GVB - LW8 -02 Pad, 1600 feet of road <br />The acreage associated with these areas totals 8.86 acres. No acreage was reported for TC1 <br />and TC2 Wells. Oxbow will need to evaluate these parcels and add them to the disturbed <br />area listed in Exhibit 1 and update the total disturbed area as appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.