Laserfiche WebLink
Tabetha Lynch, DRMS <br />Page 5 <br />January 20, 2015 <br />D. The location where topsoil has been applied during a reporting year is not reported as <br />required by Rule 2.04.13(1)(d). <br />E. Oxbow indicates that a map presenting the reclamation information would be of limited <br />utility and thus is not submitted with the ARR. Without a map that tracks reclamation, it is <br />difficult to know what areas have been seeded for a given disturbed parcel and when they <br />were seeded. For example, GVB- LW9 -01b disturbed area is reported to be 2.12 acres <br />consisting of a pad and a 6,800 foot road; and as reported in the 2013 ARR, only .58 acres <br />and 1000 feet of road have been seeded in 2009. It would be beneficial to know where the <br />.58 acres and /or the1000 foot portion of the 6,800 foot length of road has been reclaimed <br />and seeded. This information will be important for future bond release applications. <br />F. The 2013 ARR was not submitted by February 15, 2014 as required by Rule 2.04.13. <br />G. Oxbow does not indicate which seed mixture was used at each of the seeded areas. Rule <br />2.04.13(e) requires that discrete areas planted with specific seed mixes should be indicated. <br />Without this information it is difficult to know if the disturbed areas have been reclaimed in <br />accordance with the approved reclamation /revegetation plan. <br />Please address the above stated concerns in the 2014 ARR submittal. If you have any questions, please <br />contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />r� f <br />Tabetha Lynch <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Tabetha.lynch@state.co.us <br />