My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-01-20_REPORT - C1981022
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981022
>
2015-01-20_REPORT - C1981022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:56:42 PM
Creation date
1/20/2015 10:25:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
1/20/2015
Doc Name
2011 and 2013 Annual Reclamation Report Review Memo
From
DRMS
To
Oxbow Mining, LLC
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
TNL
DIH
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tabetha Lynch, DRMS <br />Page 2 <br />January 20, 2015 <br />Inconsistencies were noted between areas reported to have been reclaimed in 2011, see <br />Table 1, below. The listed area reclaimed totaled 20.05 acres. Oxbow reported to have <br />also seeded 14.08 acres. Some of the acreages reported to have been reclaimed are <br />different than the number of acres reported to have been seeded. For the majority of <br />the sites the number of acres seeded in 2011 is less than the number reported to have <br />been "reclaimed ". However, gob vent borehole site GVB- LW16 -06 and GVB- LW16 -07 <br />were reported to have more acres seeded than "reclaimed ". It is unclear why there is a <br />difference in the number of acres seeded versus the number of acres "reclaimed ". The <br />table below highlights the discrepancies for 2011. <br />Site <br />Acres - Recalimed <br />Seeded <br />Difference <br />Hubbard Fansite <br />3.2 <br />3.2 <br />0 <br />LW15 -03 <br />2.4 <br />0.91 <br />1.49 <br />LW 15 -04 <br />1.05 <br />1.05 <br />0 <br />LW 15 -05 <br />1.02 <br />1.02 <br />0 <br />LW 15 -06 <br />0.91 <br />0.91 <br />0 <br />LW15 -07 <br />0.84 <br />0.84 <br />0 <br />LW 16- 01,B,C <br />1.41 <br />0.56 <br />0.85 <br />LW16 -02 <br />0.92 <br />0.91 <br />0.01 <br />LW16 -03 <br />0.74 <br />0.74 <br />0 <br />LW 16 -04 <br />0.71 <br />0.7 <br />0.01 <br />LW 16 -05 <br />1.6 <br />1.18 <br />0.42 <br />LW16 -06 <br />0.46 <br />0.78 <br />-0.32 <br />LW16 -07 <br />0.46 <br />0.78 <br />-0.32 <br />LW18 -07 <br />0.76 <br />0.5 <br />0.26 <br />ECM -10 -68 <br />0.39 <br />0 <br />0.39 <br />ECM -10 -69 <br />0.46 <br />0 <br />0.46 <br />ECM -10 -70 <br />0.25 <br />0 <br />0.25 <br />ECM -10 -71 <br />0.37 <br />0 <br />0.37 <br />ECM -10 -72 <br />0.35 <br />0 <br />0.35 <br />ECM -10 -73 <br />0.44 <br />0 <br />0.44 <br />ECM -10 -74 <br />0.62 <br />0 <br />0.62 <br />ECM -10 -75 <br />0.38 <br />0 <br />0.38 <br />ECM -10 -76 <br />0.31 <br />0 <br />0.31 <br />Total <br />20.051 <br />14.081 <br />5.97 <br />Table 1. Acreage Comparison, 2011 Reported Reclaimed Acres vs. Seeded Acres <br />According to the 2013 ARR, Oxbow backfilled and graded 0.20 acres of land associated with <br />the II West Coal Mine Waste Facility from the 6128 to 6141 foot elevation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.