My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-12-05_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2014-12-05_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:55:50 PM
Creation date
12/5/2014 2:50:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
12/5/2014
Doc Name
Investigation Report of Sediment Laden Water Discharge at Revenue Mine in October, 2014.
From
Greg Lewicki
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
possible to look at the chemistry and determine what caused the high pH. A comparison of the two <br />samples shows that the increased alkalinity was due to the greatly increased hydroxide ion, and sodium <br />also increased from 5.6 to 424 mg /liter. After investigating how the samples were taken, it is believed <br />that the samples with high pH were placed in bottles that had an alkaline preservative but the lab did <br />not know this, so they reported the pH of what they received. In any case, there was no high pH at any <br />location and at any sample date. Also, the pH is not reflective of the high sediment that was discharged <br />into Sneffels Creek from the mine discharge. <br />Another problem with the sampling also occurred. The results from the lab showed that the TSS sample <br />from the portal discharge increased from 151 mg /liter on the 2411 of October to 235 mg /liter the next <br />day, after the problem was corrected. The mine employee was asked how this could be possible since <br />many people observed that the water was clear the morning of the 25th when they came to work. The <br />mine employee confirmed that the water was clear the following day so the only explanation is that the <br />sample dates were incorrectly written on the bottles. Tables 2 and 3 have the numbers reversed for the <br />2 dates at the portal discharge, which we believe is accurate. <br />The important item to evaluate in the water samples is the sediment present, which is the Total <br />Suspended Solids (TSS) for each sample. The Table 3 below shows these results. <br />Table 3 <br />Sample Location <br />Date of Sample <br />TSS mg /I <br />Comments <br />Mine Portal Discharge <br />10/24/14 <br />235 <br />Higher than normal <br />Mine Portal Discharge <br />10/25/14 <br />151 <br />Higher than normal <br />Sneffels Creek above Mine <br />10/24/14 <br />23 <br />Normal <br />Sneffels Creek above Mine <br />10/25/14 <br />(Not Sampled) <br />Sneffels Creek at Camp Bird <br />10/24/14 <br />35 <br />Normal <br />Sneffels Creek at Camp Bird <br />10/25/14 <br />(Not Sampled) <br />Canyon Creek at Box Canyon <br />10/24/14 <br />92 <br />Normal <br />Canyon Creek at Box Canyon <br />10/25/14 <br />DNA <br />(Not Sampled) <br />Basically, from sometime during the early morning hours of October 201 to 8 PM on that same day, <br />sediment laden water of approximately 100 -250 milligrams per liter was discharged into Sneffels Creek. <br />The mine water flow from the portal was estimated as 400 gallons per minute. The flow from the raise <br />bore was approximately 15% of this flow, or 60 gallons per minute. Sneffels Creek was estimated at <br />Page 12 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.