My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-12-05_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M2012032
>
2014-12-05_HYDROLOGY - M2012032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:55:50 PM
Creation date
12/5/2014 2:50:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2012032
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
12/5/2014
Doc Name
Investigation Report of Sediment Laden Water Discharge at Revenue Mine in October, 2014.
From
Greg Lewicki
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. Water Sampling, Results, Impacts and Discussion <br />Water samples were taken by a mine employee on October 24th at approximately 11 AM -1 PM. These <br />samples included the discharge from the mine at the end of the HDPE pipes (2) from the portal, <br />Sneffels Creek immediately above the discharge point, Sneffels Creek near the Camp Bird Mine and <br />Canyon Creek at Box Canyon near Ouray. This location is immediately upstream of the junction of <br />Canyon Creek with the Uncompahgre River. Unfortunately, no photos were taken of the water samples <br />or the locations from which they were taken. Map 1 in Appendix B shows the locations of the samples. <br />Map 2 shows the relationship of the mine workings to the raise bore location and Shaft #1. <br />On October 25th, water samples were taken at the mine discharge only since all other waters were <br />clear. At the time of the incident, no specific water coolers with designated water sample bottles were <br />on hand at the mine. Greg Lewicki instructed the water samples to be taken and the mine employee <br />found an existing cooler on site with bottles. These bottles were used for the samples. Upon evaluating <br />the results, it is seen that pH was very erratic, according to the Table 2 below. <br />Table 2 <br />Sample Location <br />Date of Sample <br />pH <br />Comments <br />Mine Portal Discharge <br />10/24/14 <br />8.7 <br />Normal <br />Mine Portal Discharge <br />10/25/14 <br />12.2 <br />Impossible <br />Sneffels Creek above Mine <br />10/24/14 <br />12.3 <br />Impossible <br />Sneffels Creek above Mine <br />10/25/14 <br />8.6 <br />Normal <br />Sneffels Creek at Camp Bird <br />10/24/14 <br />8.2 <br />Normal <br />Sneffels Creek at Camp Bird <br />10/25/14 <br />8 <br />Normal <br />Canyon Creek at Box Canyon <br />10/24/14 <br />12.8 <br />Impossible <br />As is seen from the Table 2 above, the pH of Sneffels Creek above the mine and at Camp Bird and <br />Canyon Creek at Box Canyon have 3 samples that are extremely high in pH. For Sneffels Creek above <br />the mine, the pH on the 24th was reported as 12.3 and dropped to 8.6 the following day. The pH of 8.6 <br />is more normal based on the samples that have been taken over the past 3 years. The pH of 12.3 is not <br />possible, which means that another issue resulted in this anomaly. This is also true of the other sample <br />locations except for Sneffels Creek at Camp Bird. Greg Lewicki spoke with Scott Habermehl of ACZ <br />Labs, which is the company that consistently does the water analysis for the mine. He related that <br />sodium hydroxide is used for sampling preservative for certain ions. It was also determined that the <br />bottles used over the two day sampling period were not bottles from ACZ Labs. The two mine water <br />discharge samples have full suite analyses and one had high pH and the other did not, so it was <br />Page 11 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.