Laserfiche WebLink
June 3, 2014 C- 2010- 089/New Horizon North Mine MPB <br />pond was not discharging and the water level was well below the primary spillway. The emergency spillway and <br />primary spillway are stable and functional. <br />As discussed in the field during the inspection, the side slopes will be repaired and reseeded this Fall. As an <br />additional erosion control measure, straw waddles will be placed at a level approximately half -way down the <br />pond's inner slopes entirely around the pond. <br />Spencer Shumate of the OSM shot two slope measurements using a hand -held inclinometer and obtained inner <br />slope measurements of 51% and 53 %. This could be part of the problem with rills and gullies forming on the <br />inner slopes. Following the inspection the OSM and DRMS researched both design and as -built information for <br />the pond. As stated in the Pond NHN -001 As- Built, Appendix 2.05.3(4) -6 of the permit application package <br />(PAP): "embankment inclination: 3 horizontal to 1 vertical, up and down stream slopes." The As -Built shows a <br />33% slope for inner and outer slopes of the embankments, but they appear to be much steeper than that. Please <br />verify the inner and outer slopes of the Pond NHN -001 are in compliance with the permit conditions and match the <br />certified As -Built information. A Photograph of Pond NHN -001 is shown in Photograph No 2. <br />Also during this inspection we walked the entire lengths of the NHN -001 East and NHN -001 West Ditches that <br />drain to Pond NHN -001. Significant discrepancies between the as -built documentation and what was observed on <br />the ground are noted. NHN -001 Ditches As -Built is provided in Appendix 2.053(4) -7. Map 2.053(4) -7 shows <br />the as -built route of the ditches. Map 2.05.3(4) -8 shows the standard ditch geometry for the different segment <br />types (earthen, armored, and '' /z culverts). As shown on Map 2.053(4) -7, NHN -001 West is broken into 3 <br />segments and NHN -001 East is broken into 7 segments. Different channel lining material is used for each <br />segment as shown on Table 2.05.3(4) -7 -2 NHN -001 Ditch Capacity Demonstrations (As- Built) of Appendix <br />2.05.3(4)-7 of the PAP. As part of the riprap used on all armored segments a product called Geoweb Cellular <br />Confinment Systems GW30V is used and staked to the channel bottom. The GW30V specifications are given as <br />having a cell width of 12.6 inches and length of 113 inches. In both cases whether the ditch segment is earthen or <br />armored the ditches are reported in the as -built information as triangular in geometry. The original ditch designs <br />are contained in the ARCADIS Report on Sediment Control in Appendix 2.053(4) -1. The original ditch design <br />paramaters are summarized on Table 4, page 10 of Appendix 2.05.3(4) -1 of the PAP. Based on our field <br />observations, the ditches as constructed do not match the original designs or the as -built documentation. <br />We began at the NHN -001 West Ditch on the west side of Pond NHN -001 and walked south beginning with <br />Segment 1 and ending with Segment 3. According to as -built documentation, Segment 1 and 3 are armored with 3 <br />inch and 6 inch riprap, respectively. Nowhere in these channel segments did we encounter 3 inch riprap or 6 inch <br />riprap. The as -built documentation should replicate existing ground conditions. The Geoweb was in place in all <br />cases where there was armoring. It appears that gravel size material was used throughout in place of riprap <br />material. The upper limit for gravel is 3 inches and in all areas it appeared that the material placed was a course <br />gravel ranging from 1 to 3 inches. See Photograph No 3 for West Ditch Segment 1. From the east side of Pond <br />NHN -001 we continued the inspection and walked from Segment 7 around and up to Segment 1 to the <br />approximate location of the topsoil pile storage area. Likewise, in NHN -001 East Ditches all armored sections <br />contained coarse gravel placed over the Geoweb as opposed to 3 inch or 6 inch riprap material as documented in <br />the as -built information (see Photograph No 4). There was no 6 inch Riprap observed in either the West or East <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 8 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 4 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />