Laserfiche WebLink
j <br />J <br />l <br />7 <br />7 <br />7 <br />7 <br />7 <br />7 <br />7 <br />1 <br />47 <br />1 was asking about, the '99? <br />2 MR. LEWICKI: Well, it was in the <br />3 permit, and then -- and then the NRCS was asked to <br />4 come out and look at it, and they wrote a letter <br />5 back in 1992 saying based on the management of that <br />6 property that it's not prime farmland, because it <br />7 was not being managed as prime farmland, and that <br />8 was Dean Stint's letter from 1992. <br />9 MR. PAULIN: Any more questions from <br />10 the board? Ms. Turner. <br />11 MS. TURNER: Yes, sir. Actually, <br />12 sir, the pH value is 4.5 to 8.4 is the criteria for <br />13 prime farmland. And also according to 2.06.6, the <br />14 only reference that may be used to determine prime <br />15 farmland is the National Soil Survey Handbook, which <br />16 as part of this prime farmland soil survey that was <br />17 done, it states specifically in there according to <br />18 the National Soil Survey Handbook, Barx soil on the <br />19 Morgan property were all prime farmland. <br />20 The 1992 document that was done by <br />21 Dean Stint was site specific on a small piece of <br />22 acreage there. It was one acre of ground that he <br />23 said because of the irrigation not being available, <br />24 that this piece would be disqualified. <br />25 However, Tony Waldon and them said <br />