My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-12-17_PERMIT FILE - C1992081 (19)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1992081
>
2013-12-17_PERMIT FILE - C1992081 (19)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 5:38:08 PM
Creation date
1/30/2014 8:13:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992081
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
12/17/2013
Section_Exhibit Name
Tab 12 Facilities
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A 12 -inch diameter culvert was installed above the existing 24 -inch diameter culvert <br />spillway. Certification reports for this pond modification are presented in Appendix 12 -1A, <br />Pond Certifications. <br />Capacity tables for the two ponds are shown on Exhibit 12 -3, Truck Loop Pondl, and Exhibit <br />12 -4, Rail Loop Pond2. Per Exhibit 12 -3, the Truck Loop Pond has an as-built storage <br />capacity of 1.11 acre -feet at the principal spillway elevation (24 -inch drop inlet pipe), and <br />1.56 acre -feet at the invert of the emergency spillway (12 -inch straight pipe). As shown on <br />Exhibit 12 -4, the Rail Loop Pond has an as -built storage capacity of 1.69 acre -feet at the <br />invert of the combination principal and emergency (trapezoidal) spillway. <br />Area -stage information was compiled from an October 1992 aerial photography survey, a <br />1991 sediment survey and, for the Rail Loop Pond only, a 1997 as-built survey. Certification <br />of these as-built drawings is limited to storage capacities only and is not intended to verify <br />design and/or construction standards. Design and construction certifications were completed <br />by the previous operator /owner and are referenced above. <br />Truck Loop Pond: Appendix 12 -1, Sediment Control and Pond Design, presents a <br />SEDCAD4 modeling demonstration that shows the existing storage capacity (0.97 acre -feet) <br />is adequate to detain runoff from the truck dump watershed area generated by the 10 -year, <br />24 -hour storm event and, that the as -built pond configuration meets the requirements of <br />Rules 4.05.6 and 4.05.9. <br />Rail Loop Pond: Appendix 12 -1 also contains a SEDCAD4 modeling demonstration that <br />shows the existing configuration (1.91 acre -feet of storage) is sufficient to detain runoff from <br />the 10 -year, 24 -hour storm event and that the as-built pond configuration meets the <br />requirements of Rules4.05.6 and 4.05.9. Note that there is a slight discrepancy between the <br />"as- built" storage capacity (1.69 ac -ft) and the SEDCAD model capacity (1.91 ac -ft). This is <br />due to slight differences in how the surveyed as -built values versus the SEDCAD generated <br />values were calculated. Both instances show there is sufficient capacity to detain runoff from <br />the 10 -year, 24 -hour storm event. <br />Small Area Exemptions <br />Topsoil Stockpiles: There are three topsoil stockpiles (TS -1, portion of TS -2 and TS -3) <br />within the Loadout area and six topsoil stockpiles (A, C, D, E, F and G) and one temporary <br />waste stockpile (TWS) associated with the TAHR. The locations of these stockpiles are <br />shown on Exhibit 9 -2, Soil Types & Topsoil Salvage Map (TAHR Corridor) and Exhibit 12- <br />2, Surface Water Control Plan Map (Facility Area). In order to demonstrate that these piles <br />meet the intention of Rule 4.05.2(3), SEDCAD+ analyses were conducted. These <br />demonstrations and discussions are presented in Appendix 12 -2 Small Area Exemptions. <br />Topsoil stockpile TS -1 and apportion of TS -2 have been replaced on the reclaimed portion of <br />the facilities area. The status of the remaining stockpiles has not changed since their <br />construction in the 1970's and 1980's except for the establishment of vegetative cover. Due <br />to the shallow slopes existing well established vegetative cover, and small drainage areas <br />none of the stockpiles exhibit a soil loss through sediment erosion. Consequently, the topsoil <br />TR -10 3 Revised 02/13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.