Laserfiche WebLink
Whetstone <br />AssociatesS Technical Memorandum <br />professional engineer registered in Colorado is required. The drawings should address the <br />following. <br />a. The expected depth to erosion resistant material on the northwest side of the berm, of <br />which the design is said to take advantage. <br />b. Based on Figures 4 and 5, the width of the existing berm is approximately 10 —1 S feet <br />wide. The second paragraph and Table 17 state the spillway will be 10 feet wide. The last <br />paragraph states the spillway will be constructed on the northwest side of the berm, <br />rather than the middle of the berm; and Figure 13 suggests a "V" shaped spillway. <br />Please provide a plan view, longitudinal and lateral cross- sections on the drawings <br />showing how the spillway will be constructed and protected to prevent head cutting the <br />berm in the event the spillway is utilized during the 100 year, 24 -hour design storm <br />event. The design also needs to provide spillway and spillway channel protection <br />analyses demonstrating the protection is adequately sized. <br />c. There is no way presented in the SWRP design plan to drain the pond via gravity. The <br />DRMS suggests the Operator consider a low level outlet be designed into the pond in <br />case a call is put on the Dolores River, the Operator can comply with the DOWR <br />requirements. (NOTE – The DRMS checked with the Colorado Division of Water <br />Resources (DWR) District 63 water commissioner ('Tom Brigham) regarding the status of <br />the Dolores River appropriations. DWR's requirement to release retained stormwater <br />within 72 hours is seasonal and is subject to change.). <br />d. Please address the reclamation /post mining plan for the SWRP. The DBMS strongly <br />encourages breaching the embankment upon closure unless the landowner has a use for <br />the pond (e.g., stockpond) and intends to maintain it. extensive <br />Cotter response: <br />The revised DDP contains six engineering drawings (Plates) that have been signed and <br />stamped by a Professional Engineer registered in the state of Colorado. The drawings <br />address the four issues (a -d) as follows: <br />a. The design for the planned SWRP includes a new spillway located at the existing <br />lightly traveled road leading toward the lysimeter. The design does not rely upon <br />natural erosion - resistant material within the spillway approach or beneath the traveled <br />roadway. Instead, the SWRP capacity is significantly expanded, such that the overflow <br />velocity from the pond is 0.42 ft /sec, which will result in very little scour. Rock <br />protection will be installed on the spillway crest and exit section. The required rock size <br />is D50 = 0.75 inches, based on the 0.42 ft /sec overflow velocity and a suitable factor of <br />safety. <br />b. The planned spillway is a 10 -ft wide rock -lined trapezoidal spillway. The plan view, <br />longitudinal cross section, and perpendicular cross section are provided in the revised <br />DDP. The engineering design drawings have been signed and stamped by a <br />professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado. <br />4148A.131030 8 <br />