My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-10-30_REVISION - M1977310 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977310
>
2013-10-30_REVISION - M1977310 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:28:45 PM
Creation date
11/5/2013 5:47:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977310
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/30/2013
Doc Name
DRAINAGE DESIGN PLAN FOR THE JD6 MINE
From
COTTER
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
TC1
SJM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Whetstone <br />Associates <br />Technical Memorandum <br />appropriate analyses demonstrating adequate protection is provided by the specified <br />channel protection. <br />Cotter response: <br />a. Table 14 contains WinTR -55 model output, with the 10 -11 and 20 -11 depths <br />truncated /removed. In the NRCS WinTR -55 model, the user specifies channel <br />bottom width and side slope ratio, and the model generates a stage - capacity table <br />for flow depths of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 20 feet. The 5 -ft depths were shown in the <br />table because portions of the UDS, MDS, LDS -E, and LDS -N exceed 2 ft in depth. <br />The table was not meant to imply that all channel segments were 5 -ft in depth. A <br />footnote has been added to the table in the revised DDP. <br />The constructed channel depths were surveyed at eight profile locations along the <br />Upper Diversion Structure, seven profile locations along the Middle Diversion <br />Structure, four profile locations along the Lower Diversion Structure — East and six <br />profile locations along the Lower Diversion Structure — North. The channel depths, <br />are summarized in the revised DDP. <br />b. A stability analysis was conducted using the Thorne and Zevenbergen (1985) <br />resistance equations to compute the mean velocity and Fronde number, which were <br />then compared to the Maximum Permissible Velocity or the Fronde number <br />established for channel stability. The Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual <br />(UDFCD 2001, 2008), recommends that structures be designed with a permissible <br />velocity of 5 ft /sec or Froude number of 0.6 for soil types A and B and of 7 ft /sec or <br />Fronde number of 0.8 for soil types C and D. Engineered channels at the JD -6 Mine <br />are constructed in soil types C and D (rock) and are thus designed to meet the v = 7 <br />ft /sec or Fr = 0.8 criteria in erodible soils. <br />Results indicate that the existing MDS, LDS -E, and LDS -N diversion structures are <br />capable of conveying the 100 -year 24 -hour storm with an average velocity of less <br />than the design criteria of 7 ft /sec. The average calculated velocity for the MDS, <br />LDS -E, and LDS -N profiles was 3.20 ft /sec and the maximum calculated velocity <br />was 5.79 ft /sec. <br />Results indicate that the UDS, as currently constructed, is incapable of conveying <br />the 100 -year 24 -hour storm with an average velocity of less than 7 ft /sec. The UDS <br />channel has been redesigned with shallower side slopes (3:1), a shallower local bed <br />slope, and six check/drop structures to dissipate grade and energy. The allowable <br />bed slope for the D84 grain size of 25 mm is 0.035 ft /ft. This slope will be graded <br />into native material between the drop structures, as shown in Plate 3 of the revised <br />DDP. <br />11. Page 26, SWRP spillway. A spillway is required for retention ponds. The DRMS <br />acknowledges the Operator is committing to construct the recommended spillway upon <br />approval of this permit amendment. - However, design drawings stamped and signed by a <br />4148A.131030 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.