My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1981035 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981035
>
_INSPECTION - C1981035 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2020 1:20:41 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 1:35:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981035
IBM Index Class Name
Inspection
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Tom Bird
Inspection Date
10/1/2013
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 1, 2013 C-1981-035/King Coal Mine MLT <br /> HYDROLOGIC BALANCE - Rule 4.05 <br /> Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, 4.05.6; Discharge Structures <br /> 4.05.7, 4.05.10; Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water Monitoring 4.05.13; <br /> Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Drainage — Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; Impoundments <br /> 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br /> • We inspected each of the manholes at King II, and discussed the drainage system that <br /> collects runoff from within the disturbed area and conveys the flow to the sediment pond. <br /> • As noted in the inspection report for Sept. 23, 2013, the operator continues to explore <br /> options, other than the erosion logs used currently, for protecting the drop inlets from <br /> becoming clogged with sediment, while preventing water from being impeded from reaching <br /> the inlets. (The Division observed that even if the manholes and buried culverts were to <br /> become clogged with sediment, all runoff from the disturbed area would still be directed to <br /> the King II sedimentation pond for treatment prior to discharge.) <br /> • Around the northern perimeter of the Coal Stack Tube 92 pad, a swale intercepts any runoff <br /> and carries the flow east and south, eventually into Manhole 92. A short segment of large- <br /> diameter (perhaps 60") culvert pipe has been placed in the swale to allow access to the small <br /> area between the swale and the topsoil stockpile. Neither the swale nor the culvert pipe <br /> appear on Map King II-007A, and so are not "designed",per se, which is not problematic. <br /> However, the culvert is filled approximately half-way with sediment, and the top has been <br /> crushed. The Division suggests that some improvements could be made to this feature, to <br /> ensure that the swale continues to function as intended and that access across the swale, if <br /> determined to be necessary, is not impeded. <br /> • The water level in each of the sediment ponds (King I East and West and King II) had <br /> dropped since the previous inspection. Presumably the changes are due to evaporation and <br /> infiltration; no discharges have occurred. <br /> • The operator is considering extending the two culvert pipes (C6 and C7 on Map King II- <br /> 007A) towards the pond. This will reduce or eliminate the need for the two trapezoidal ditch <br /> sections at the culvert outlets that have proved difficult to maintain, and also increase the <br /> surface area available for the mine's truck traffic and material storage. Extending these pipes <br /> can probably be accomplished through a minor revision to the permit. <br /> • At King I, runoff from the natural drainage located south of the former tipple enters an 18" <br /> culvert pipe (Reach 3 on Map King I-007) and runs beneath the surface facilities area, <br /> eventually reaching the West Pond. The inlet to this culvert was inspected and found to be <br /> clear. <br /> EXCESS SPOIL and DEVELOPMENT WASTE—Rule 4.09 <br /> Placement; Drainage Control; Surface Stabilization: <br /> • Much of the coal mine waste that had been end-dumped on top of the refuse pile has now <br /> been spread out and compacted. <br /> • Care should be taken to ensure that proper drainage is maintained at all times, including the <br /> cross slope of the top surface of the pile and the collection ditch that parallels the pile on the <br /> south. <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 3 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: I Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.