Laserfiche WebLink
Lewicki & Associates <br />C -2010 -089 / TR -04 / PAR -2 <br />09 -Sep -2013 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />DBMS 09109: The majority of items were updated with the response, as <br />requested. However, the title of Appendix 2.05.3(4) -6 should be, "Pond NHN- <br />001 As- Built" and Appendix 2.05.3(4) -7 should be titled, "NHN -001 Ditches As- <br />Built ". Please revise these two titles in the TOC. <br />2, DBMS 07/22: New Appendix 2.05.3(4) -7 has been provided with this application. The <br />Division notes that throughout this Appendix, nomenclature used to identify the ditches is <br />inconsistent with that used in the Arcadis design report of Appendix 2.05.3(4) -1. In the <br />Arcadis design, and throughout the approved permit text and maps, the ditches are named <br />"NHN -001 West" and "NHN -00I East ". The new text and maps refer instead to "Pond <br />001 Ditches" or "Pond NHN -00I Ditches ". Please modify the various texts and maps <br />submitted with this application to be consistent with the nomenclature already established <br />for these features. <br />DRMS 09/09: The names were changed in some instances, but not in all. Please refer <br />to the attached photocopies for specific locations that remain to be corrected. <br />3. DRMS 07122: The new Appendix provides an analysis of the ditches that were <br />constructed. However, the narrative does not refer back to the original approved design, <br />and fails to describe why significant modifications to the ditch geometry (triangular <br />versus trapezoidal) were instituted during construction. <br />DRMS 09/09: Some discussion was provided about the selection of a triangular design. <br />However, the text still does not provide a reference to the approved design. Please insert <br />a reference to Appendix 2.05.3(4) -I of the permit, which is where the approved ditch <br />designs are found. <br />4. DRMS 07122: The as -built designs refer to segments of ditch having been lined with 3" <br />and 6" riprap. During numerous site inspections, Division personnel have not observed <br />that riprap of any size has been used to armor the NHN -001 East and West collection <br />ditches. Please revise the application to accurately portray and evaluate the armoring <br />system used for certain segments of these ditches. <br />DRMS 09109: Appendix 2.05.3(4) -7 text (page 1) was expanded to address the materials <br />used in armoring specific sections of the NHN -001 ditches. This item is resolved <br />5. DRMS 07/22: Map 2.05.3(4) -8 illustrates typical cross sections of the ditches, but <br />neither this map nor the narrative provides the required depth and width for the ditches <br />and half - culvert. Please incorporate width and depth information, by ditch segment, into <br />the permit. <br />DBMS 09/09: The Channel Properties section of Table 2.05.3(4) -7 -2 was updated, as <br />requested, to include information on the channel depth and width. The information <br />provided appears to have been mathematically derived from the required channel <br />capacity section of the table, and it is not clear whether the dimensions were actually <br />measured in the field. Since this Appendix is intended to provide as -built information, it <br />