|
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />, I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I I
<br />I
<br />
<br />Figure 5-D
<br />
<br />Figure 5-E
<br />
<br />Figure 6-A
<br />Figure 6-B
<br />Figure 6-C.
<br />Figure 6-D
<br />Figure 6-E
<br />Figure 7-A
<br />Figure 7-B
<br />Figure 7-C.
<br />Figure 7-D
<br />Figure 7-E
<br />Figure 8-A
<br />
<br />Figure 8-B
<br />
<br />Figure 8-C.
<br />Figure 8-D
<br />
<br />Figure 8-E
<br />
<br />Figure 9.A
<br />Figure 9-B
<br />
<br />Figure 9-C.
<br />Figure 9-D
<br />Figure 9-E
<br />Figure 10-A
<br />
<br />Figure 10-B
<br />
<br />Figure 10-C.
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and
<br />GreenwayILittleton (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and
<br />GreenwayILittleton (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 1: Denver (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 1: Denver (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 1: Denver (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 1: Denver (Pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 1: Denver (Pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(Pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 4: South Metro
<br />(pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and
<br />GreenwayILittleton (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and
<br />GreenwayILittleton (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and GreenwayILittleton
<br />(pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />
<br />IV
<br />
<br />P:\DataIGEN\CWCBIChatfieldlReportI2.02IRevisedChatReportI03\T ABLE OF CONTENTS2.Q3.doc
<br />
|