|
<br />I
<br />I
<br />'I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />Figure 10-D
<br />
<br />Figure 10-E
<br />
<br />Figure II-A
<br />Figure ll-B
<br />Figure ll-C.
<br />Figure II-D
<br />Figure 1l.E
<br />Figure 12-A
<br />Figure 12-B
<br />Figure 12.C.
<br />Figure 12-D
<br />Figure 12-E
<br />Figure l3-A
<br />
<br />Figure l3.B
<br />
<br />Figure l3-C.
<br />Figure 13-D
<br />
<br />Figure 13-E
<br />
<br />Figure 14-A
<br />Figure 14-B
<br />
<br />Figure 14.C.
<br />Figure 14-D
<br />Figure 14.E
<br />Figure IS-A
<br />
<br />Figure IS.B
<br />
<br />Figure IS-C.
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario S: Mixed Use: Central and
<br />GreenwayILittleton (Pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario S: Mixed Use: Central and
<br />GreenwayILittleton (pool Size: 7,700 AF)
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 1: Denver (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario I: Denver (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario I: Denver (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 1: Denver (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario I: Denver (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 2: Central (Pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton (pool Size:
<br />2,900 AF)
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 4: South Metro (Pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 4: South Metro
<br />(pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 4: South Metro (Pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario S: Mixed Use: Central and
<br />GreenwayILittleton (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario S: Mixed Use: Central and
<br />GreenwayILittleton (pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario S: Mixed Use: Central and GreenwayILittleton
<br />(pool Size: 2,900 AF)
<br />
<br />v
<br />
<br />P:lData\GEN\CWCB\ChatfieldIReportI2.02\RevisedChatReportl 03\T ABLE OF CONTENTS2-03.doc
<br />
|