|
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />I
<br />
<br />Figure I-A
<br />Figure 1-B
<br />
<br />Figure I-C.
<br />Figure 1-D
<br />Figure 1-E
<br />Figure 2-A
<br />Figure 2-B
<br />
<br />Figure 2-C
<br />Figure 2-D
<br />Figure 2-E
<br />Figure 3.A
<br />
<br />Figure 3.B
<br />
<br />Figure 3.C
<br />Figure 3-D
<br />
<br />Figure 3-E
<br />
<br />Figure 4-A
<br />
<br />Figure 4-B
<br />
<br />Figure 4-C.
<br />Figure 4-D
<br />Figure 4.E
<br />Figure 5-A
<br />
<br />Figure 5-B
<br />
<br />Figure 5-C.
<br />
<br />LIST OF FIGURES
<br />
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 1: Denver (Pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 1: Denver
<br />(pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario ]: Denver (Pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 1: Denver (Pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario I: Denver (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 2: Central
<br />(pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 2: Central (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 2: Central (Pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 2: Central (Pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(Pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 3: Greenway and Littleton
<br />(pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 4: South Metro
<br />(Pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation Difference, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Lake Elevation Exceedance Curve, Scenario 4: South Metro (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Inflows, Spills and Storage, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and
<br />GreenwayILittleton (Pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Demand, Evaporation and Met Demand, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and
<br />GreenwayILittleton (pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />Reservoir Elevation, Scenario 5: Mixed Use: Central and GreenwayILittleton
<br />(pool Size: 20,600 AF)
<br />
<br />III
<br />
<br />P:\DataIGEN\CWCBlChatfieldlReportI2.02\RevisedChatReportI03\T ABLE OF CONTENTS2.o3.doc
<br />
|