Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'. <br /> <br />Part 3 _ Diversion Data (Contd) <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />Combinea diversione from the Arkansas River of ditohes in Colorado <br /> <br />Water District 67 averaged 159,100 AF annually during the historic 1908-1942 <br /> <br />period, and, though details are not disclosed by individual ditches in attached <br /> <br />tabulations 12, 12-A or 12-B, or in Summary Table E. the total distrio~ <br /> <br />diversions were made in the following amounts aud proportions I <br /> <br />ACRE FEET ANNUALLY <br /> <br />PERCENTS OF TOTALS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Fort Bent Ditoh <br />Keesee Ditoh <br />Ami ty Canal <br />Lamar Canal <br />Smrr above Lamar (12_A) <br />Ryd~ Ditoh <br />Menvell. Ditoh <br />IT and Graham Ditches <br />Buffalo Ditoh <br />Sisson Ditches <br />Sum bslow. Lamar (l2-B) <br /> <br />Total Water District 67 (12) <br /> <br />15.800 <br />3.700 <br />79,000 <br />33,600 <br /> <br />9.9 <br />2.3 <br />50.2 <br />21.1 <br /> <br />132,900 <br /> <br />83.5 <br /> <br />2,100 <br />4,600 <br />8,100 <br />9.500 <br />1,900 <br /> <br />1.; <br />2.9 <br />5.1 <br />6.0 <br />Il.2 <br /> <br />26.200 <br />159.100 <br /> <br />16.5 <br /> <br />100.0 <br /> <br />Histori~ diversion rslations between groups of ditches in Colorado <br /> <br />below. and above Caddoa may be expressed by the 22.8 percent relation between <br />the 159,100 AF of average annual diversions in Water Distriot 67 (Tabla 12) <br />and the 698,100 AF of average annual diversions in Water Districts ~ and 17 <br />(Table 11), or may be expressed by the 18.6 peroent relation between the <br />159,100 AF of average annual diversions in Water Distriot 67 (Table 12) and <br />the 857,200 AF or three district sum in Colorado (Table 13). <br /> <br />Inoludimg the 84.400 AF of average annual diversions in Kansas <br />(Table 14), the combined total in both States become~, 941,600 AF. In <br /> <br />relation to the combined total in both States. the diver sions upstream from <br /> <br /> <br />Caddo!r, 698,100 AF (Table 11) represented' 74.1 percent, and the diver siol!lll <br /> <br /> <br />j,. downstream from Caddoa, 243.500 AF (of whioh 159,100 in Colo... Table 12, and <br /> <br /> <br />84,400 in Kansr-Table 14) represente~ 25.9 peroent of the 941,600 AF total. <br /> <br />ftlB.. <br />