Laserfiche WebLink
<br />January 1990: <br /> <br />Feb1'UllTJ 1990: <br /> <br />May 4, 1990: <br /> <br />June 1990: <br /> <br />October 9, 1990: <br /> <br />October-November 1990: <br /> <br />March 4, 1991: <br /> <br />March 21, 1991: <br /> <br />July-October 1991: <br /> <br />October 22,1991: <br /> <br />The Funding Agreement and Repayment Contract between the <br />United States and the San Juan Water Commission, New Mexico, is <br />completed. <br /> <br />Reclamation re-initiates ESA consultation based on new fishery <br />information. <br /> <br />U.S. F&WL Service issues a Draft Biological Opinion on the <br />Project; a jeopardy opinion with no reasonable and prudent <br />alternative. <br /> <br />Reclamation met with a number of State, Federal, and private field <br />biologists who are knowledgeable regarding endangered Colorado <br />squaw fish and razorback sucker. The meetings focused on the <br />biological basis of the draft opinion and the availability of stored <br />water in Navajo Reservoir, after fuU depletions by Colorado and New <br />Mexico, to meet critical flow needs of the endangered fish through <br />changes in Navajo Reservoir operation. <br /> <br />Meeting to discuss the process to develop a potential alternative to the <br />draft biological opinion for the Project was held in Salt Lake City, <br />Utah. Representatives from Reclamation, the Service, Indian tribes, <br />project sponsors, and water users, and Upper Colorado Basin States <br />were in attendance. Environmental groups were invited but did not <br />attend. Three teams; biological team, hydrology team, and legal <br />team, and their chairpersons and respective first meeting dates were <br />identified. <br /> <br />Meetings of the biological team were held in Denver, Colorado. The <br />team determined there was a defensible biological basis for the <br />Project that would allow for the development of a "Reasonable and <br />Prudent Alternative. " <br /> <br />Reclamation transmits to Service a recommended reasonable and <br />prudent alternative to avoid jeopardy. The alternative contains the <br />recommendations of the biology team and includes the development <br />of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the approprioJe <br />parties to protect San Juan River flows for the endangered fish and <br />agree to participation in a San Juan Basin Recovery Implementation <br />Program. <br /> <br />Service issues revised draft Biological Opinion for the Project; <br />jeopardy with a reasonable and prudent alternative. <br /> <br />Negotiations regarding the MOU continue including the development <br />of a supplemental agreement which provides protection of flows until <br />the MOU is signed by all parties. <br /> <br />Notice of Intent to sue from the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund et. <br />al. The Notice of Intent raises questions about compUance with the <br /> <br />7 <br />